Do Attorneys Have License?

 Do Attorneys Have License? 

Well is has been a great concern to "We The People", because you have so many attorneys think they have power and control over people legal matter or lawful matters. If so, who gave them the delegated authority to represent you and are the attorneys is apart of the constitution. 

There are so many books written by attorneys saying they have license to practice law. 

I went to Rutgers Law Library to find information on officer of the courts aka attorneys/lawyers. The Librarian at the information desk was trying so hard to push an attorney on me to help me with my legal affairs. She told me I need an license attorney to help me. I explain to her my strongly disdained for attorneys who out her to steal, lie, extort money from clients, corrupted, and are the true criminals.

I explain to her that I had eight different attorneys to help me with a legal matter on the same case and they treated me terrible. They lie to me and few of them was disbarred to practice law and their license was taken from them.  I was so turned off about the handful of attorneys in New Jersey are so corrupted and only care about money not to get justice for their clients. 

Furthermore, they do not have license to practice law. She told me that they do have license to practice law, so she bring me a book that a statutory attorney/lawyer wrote about attorneys law license. Because she brought me a book that a statutory law wrote does not mean anything because his point view is under what they was taught in so called law school and from the BAR ASSOCIATION who he have to become a member of after passing the bar examine. 

They then get a bar card with a bar number. Then they get sworn in to uphold their State and United States Constitution oath and get a certificate of good standards, ethics and admission to practice law from the Supreme Court of New Jersey. They also take a solemn oath to the bar guile as a statutory lawyer. A statutory lawyer specializes in laws passed by legislative bodies (statutes), working to draft, interpret, and apply these written laws, which range from federal acts (like the U.S. Code) to state codes, often focusing on areas like tax, environment, or specific regulations, requiring deep knowledge of legislative history and administrative rules beyond just court decisions. They help governments create laws and advise clients on compliance, ensuring actions align with codified law, unlike common law systems based purely on judicial precedent. 

Now law school does not teach you law. They are not proficient in Common law, Natural Law and the true law of the land which is the Constitution law. So, how can an attorney protect their client if they do not the law that protect the people rights. 

You do have attorneys that practice Constitutional law but they still a statutory lawyer. 

Now back to if attorneys have license. The answer is no because based on the legal definition in Black Law Dictionary that most courts used to define words and Cornell Law School website definition defines the word license, certificate and certification. 

According to the definition attorneys does not have a license to practice law. They have an admission to practice law. This is why some court will say they are admitted to the Bar. It is important we understand the meaning of words because these legal vampire will suck you dry and play these word games with their legalese. 

The courts will say if you practice law without license is a crime. Now keep in mind who are the people who putting out the laws. They are the people who are part of the BAR. They are lawyers, so they are the gatekeepers who write the law. They monopolies, who can so call practice law and who can not. It is their club. If you are not a member who is a part of the club, you are not in it.

The questions you may want to ask yourself, did the constitution give these attorneys constitutional rights to say who should practice law and who should not. I know each states statutes says you can not practice law without a license and the courts will uphold that statute and trying to put you in jail. The reason they do that because they can not control a person who knows the law and they are not a part of the BAR ASSOCIATION of their Guile. 

So you have people like Rutgers Librarian telling you attorney has license to practice law. 

The reality of it all is that Admission to the bar IS licensure, even if the document is called a certificate of admission or order of the court. 

Courts look at substance, not labels. See the court will call it labels, to gain control over the usage of words to protect their bar members and alienate non bar members to hold them accountable with the legal definition jargon over the difference between license and certificate. A mean of a words is not a label it is what defines means of things are or who they are for ones understanding. 

True Statements:

•  The ABA (American Bar Association) is private.
•  Many state bar associations (e.g., New Jersey State Bar Association) are voluntary.
•  Lawyers don’t carry a plastic “license” like a driver’s license. They have a bar card.
•  The Supreme Court doesn’t print licenses like the DMV.

Nor can attorneys get professional license from New Jersey's professional licensing, which is managed by the Division of Consumer Affairs (DCA)/ who oversees numerous Professional and Occupational Boards and Committees (like Engineering, Medical Examiners, Accountancy) that grant and regulate licenses for various professions, using online portals like newjersey.mylicense.com. 

The Real Legal Structure (This Is the Part Most People Miss)

Who Licenses Lawyers?

Not the American Bar Association.
Not the voluntary state bar association, who is a private non for profit organization.
Not a private “club.”

The STATE of New Jersey which is a business, acting through its Supreme Court

How Attorney Licensure Actually Works (Legally)

Step-by-Step:

1. State Supreme Court sets admission rules

2. Board of Bar Examiners administers exam & character review

3. Board certifies eligibility

4. Supreme Court enters an ORDER OF ADMISSION

5. That order grants legal authority to practice law

 That they call their certificate of admission to practice law a license, even if:

• It is judicially issued

• It is called an “admission”

• It is enforced through contempt powers instead of an agency

If you know the role of a Supreme Court you will know they are not assigned to administrate licences to their own people in their law profession. If so, would that be consider their is no separation of power that the constitution talks about.?

How can the Legislator  tell people they can not practice law without license. They are turning a right to a privilege through administrative law. 

A person has an inherent right to learn, know, interpret, and apply law for their own defense and affairs.
The state may not license or prohibit that.
What the state regulates is the professional representation of others, not the knowledge or use of law itself.

See the people did not created New Jersey Supreme Court. It has been invaded. The New Jersey Supreme Court wasn't created directly by "the people" but was established by the 1776 New Jersey Constitution, evolving significantly with the 1947 Constitution, which people ratified, making it the state's highest court, designed as a modern judiciary for the public, with its justices appointed by the Governor, not directly elected by citizens aka the People that New Jersey Constitution reference about. The People are the govern who governs the government aka public officials, public severance.  So this is why they can monitor who can practice law and who 

can not. New Jersey Supreme 

Court is not in alignment with the United State Constitution that's representing the American

People.

Key Points on its Creation & Structure:

• Colonial Roots (1776): The initial court system, similar to Britain's but legislative-dominated, began with the first state constitution after independence.
• Modern Form (1947): The people ratified a new constitution that reimagined government, establishing the Supreme Court as the state's ultimate authority and giving it greater independence, a design intended to serve the public.
• Appointment, Not Election: Justices are appointed by the Govern the people established the constitutional framework through ratification,nor (with Senate confirmation) for 7-year terms, then reappointed until age 70, not chosen directly by voters.
• "For the People": The 1947 framework aimed to create a judiciary "by and for the people," a model often praised as the nation's finest. 

So, while the court's members (justices) are appointed, reflecting a representative, not direct, democratic process for the judiciary. 

As for the framers of the U.S. Constitution, representing the American people, created the Supreme Court by establishing the judicial branch in Article III, but they delegated the details of its structure (like number of justices, lower courts) to Congress, which then passed the Judiciary Act of 1789 to set it up. So, the Constitution mandated its existence, and Congress organized it. 

Key Points:

• Constitutional Foundation: Article III, Section 1 states, "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish".
• Congressional Action: The First Congress, under President George Washington, passed the Judiciary Act of 1789 to bring the Court to life, creating the first justices and lower courts.
• People's Role: The Constitution itself was a product of the people's representatives, establishing the framework for all three branches of government, including the judiciary. 

In essence, the people, through the Constitution, willed the Supreme Court into being, and through their elected representatives in Congress, they built its initial structure. 

Based on the information of the US Constitution.

The practice of law is not an inherent or fundamental right.

 It is a court-regulated privilege requiring authorization,

which may be withdrawn for cause, subject to due process.” 

That statement aligns with:

• Schware

• In re Griffiths

• Konigsberg

• State supreme court precedent nationwide

• Practicing law requires permission

• Permission means privilege, not inherent right

• The Supreme Court does not frame this as a natural right

• Authorization can be revoked

Lawyers are not licensed at all, however, the court will argue that

Licensure exists regardless of terminology-certificate for admission.

See the courts force people to recognized this foolish certificate

as licensure. It is not the attorney right to practice law it is a 

privilege. It is the People right to practice law because they did

not take an oath with the BAR guile and pay membership dues

to keep their privilege to practice law.  An attorney generally cannot practice law if they have not paid their required bar membership fees. Failure to pay these fees typically results in the attorney being declared administratively ineligible or not in good standing to practice law by the state's Supreme Court or bar association. 

Practicing law without being in good standing with the bar association is considered the unauthorized practice of law, which can lead to serious sanctions, including disciplinary action, suspension, or even disbarment. 

It is all about money with the BAR not the interest of the protection of the People who hire

these money hungry crook attorneys. 

Consequences of Unpaid Bar Membership Fees

• Ineligible to Practice: The primary consequence is the loss of the right to practice law in the relevant jurisdiction.
• Not in Good Standing: The attorney is officially considered "not in good standing," a status that is often public record.
• Cannot be Admitted Pro Hac Vice: An ineligible attorney cannot be temporarily admitted to practice in another jurisdiction for a specific case (pro hac vice).
• Penalties for Reinstatement: To regain eligibility, the attorney must typically pay all outstanding fees, late penalties, and sometimes an additional fee to be removed from the ineligible list.
• Potential Disciplinary Action: Continued practice while ineligible can lead to formal disciplinary proceedings, separate from the administrative issue of unpaid fees. 

Attorneys who do not wish to practice law or pay the fees must formally resign from the bar or seek an official exemption, if available, to avoid these penalties. 

Base on the information in my research the attorney does not indirectly have license to 

practice law as they lead  believe.  One of my law course professor who is an attorney  recommend this book

Called "COMMON LAW HANDBOOK FOR JUROR'S, SHERIFF'S, BAILIFFS, AND JUSTICE'S"

On page 25   XVI. RIGHT TO PRACTICE LAW, it states ...

"A State cannot exclude a person from the  practice of law or from any other occupation in a manner or for reason that contravene the 

Due Process Clause of Fourteenth Amendment

." Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U.S. 232 (1975)".

"The practice of law cannot be licensed by any state/State." Schware v. Board of Examiners, United State

Report 353 U.S. page 238,239.

"The practice of law is an occupation of common right." Sims v. Aherns, 271 SW 720 (1925)."

Now the statutes of each states says if someone is caught practice unauthorized will be penalized. According

to Sherar v. Cullen, 481    F. 2d 946 (1973), "There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one

because of this exercise of Constitutional Rights."

Now each law I quoted about does not specifically say attorney can not be license but it does indirectly

pertaining to the occupation of law. Because the state court make license to practice is a thing. Which is not.

It is just lice saying that a from the Supreme Court is a certificate of admission to practice law

 is a license, According to the legal definition a certificate and license are defined differently. It

is not used interchangeably. 

"WE THE PEOPLE" Governments are instituted among Men, driving their 

Just powers from the consent of the governed"