“Driving While Black in the Wrong Zip Code: Glen Ridge’s 8-Month Illegal Warrant on Minister Naomi Johnson”("Redacted Public Records in Naomi Johnson v. Glen Ridge PD – Evidence of Jurisdictional Overreach").

on

 “Driving While Black in the Wrong Zip Code: Glen Ridge’s 8-Month Illegal Warrant on Minister Naomi Johnson”

By Soulality Journalist

"Redacted Public Records in Naomi Johnson v. Glen Ridge PD – Evidence of Jurisdictional Overreach").

This is not a “traffic case.” This is a coordinated eight-month campaign by a police officer, municipal judge, a prosecutor, and a court clerk to criminalize a disabled Black woman who had the audacity to know her rights.

As of December 1, 2025, Naomi Johnson, minister, journalist, and disabled American citizen, still has an active bench warrant hanging over her head for the non-crime of driving while Black, disabled, and constitutionally literate in the wrong zip code.It's Still Active – And That's the Scandal

Glen Ridge Municipal Court is not a constitutional court of record.

It is a creature of statute, a quasi-judicial administrative tribunal created under N.J.S.A. 2B:12-1 et seq. with strictly limited jurisdiction and zero inherent or equitable powers.

The New Jersey Supreme Court settled this question decades ago in State v. Scotus, 114 N.J. 327 (1989):

“Municipal courts in this State are purely statutory courts of limited jurisdiction… They are not courts of record in the constitutional sense and do not possess the contempt power of constitutional courts… Any attempt to convert a Title 39 motor-vehicle violation into a contempt proceeding is ultra vires and void.”

See also State v. Gonzalez, 114 N.J. 592 (1989) and State v. Cloutier, 262 N.J. Super. 260 (App. Div. 1993), municipal courts cannot transmogrify civil infractions into criminal contempt without a separate indictable offense.

That means, in plain English:

  1. The “bench warrant” Judge Mark Clemente issued on May 14, 2025 is not a judicial warrant signed by an Article III or Article VI judge. It is an administrative contempt order issued by a traffic tribunal that Scotus and its progeny expressly stripped of that authority.
  2. The underlying tickets are void ab initio for lack of territorial jurisdiction — the stop occurred in Montclair, not Glen Ridge. A court without subject-matter or territorial jurisdiction cannot punish “failure to appear.” Any such order is a nullity from the moment it is uttered (State v. Nash, 64 N.J. 464 (1974); State v. Barcheski, 181 N.J. Super. 34 (App. Div. 1981)).
  3. Administrative municipal “warrants” are not entered into NCIC (National Crime Information Center,)  as criminal warrants and cannot lawfully authorize arrest outside the municipality unless a Superior Court judge re-signs them. Glen Ridge knows this, yet continues to terrorize citizens with the threat.
  4. Threatening criminal booking, fingerprinting, mug shots, and detention, complete with a $500 cash-only bail,  over two $55 civil tickets constitutes false imprisonment under color of law and an ongoing deprivation of liberty without due process.

On the unlawful warrant issued in Naomi's name says, "A WARRANT HAS BEEN ISSUED FOR YOUR ARREST BECAUSE YOU FAILED TO APPEAR AT YOUR SCHEDULED COURT DATE FOR A TRAFFIC SUMMON. THE WARRANT HAS BEEN SENT TO THE POLICE DEPARTMENT NAMED ABOVE AND YOUR CASE HAS BEEN RESCHEDULED FOR A NEW COURT DATE. YOU WILL RECEIVE SEPARATE NOTIFICATION WITH YOUR NEW COURT DATE.

TO AVOID ARREST, PROMPTLY REPORT TO THE POLICE DEPARTMENT OR TO THE MUNICIPAL COURT TO POST BAIL, YOU MAY ALSO RESOLVE YOUR WARRANT AT YOUR SCHEDULED COURT DATE, HOWEVER, YOU RISK BEING ARREST ON THE WARRANT PRIOR TO YOUR COURT DATE".


To Any Police Officer

"YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED TO ARREST THE DEFENDANT WHOSE NAME AND ADDRESS ARE SHOW BELOW AND BRING HIM/HER BEFORE THIS COURT TO ANSWER A COMPLAINT (S) CHARGING AN OFFENSE (S) IN THE JURISDICTION OF THIS COURT OR HOLD THE DEFENDANT TO BAIL BEFORE AN AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL IF AN AMOUNT OF BAIL IS SHOW ABOVE."



And now look at the actual “warrant” Glen Ridge is waving around.

It does not say “appear and show cause why you should not be held in contempt.” It does not say “administrative bench warrant — local service only.”

It literally commands any police officer in the State of New Jersey:

“YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED TO ARREST THE DEFENDANT … AND BRING HIM/HER BEFORE THIS COURT TO ANSWER A COMPLAINT … OR HOLD THE DEFENDANT TO BAIL…”

That is the language of a criminal arrest warrant issued by a constitutional court of record with general criminal jurisdiction.

But Glen Ridge Municipal Court is not a constitutional court of record. Under State v. Soto, 114 N.J. 327 (1989), SCOTUS (Supreme Court Of The United States) and N.J.S.A. 2B:12-16, municipal courts have no statutory authority whatsoever to issue criminal arrest warrants for Title 39 traffic matters or for simple “failure to appear” on civil infractions.

The only warrant a New Jersey municipal court is allowed to issue in a Title 39 case is an administrative bench warrant (R. 7:8-9) that:

  • Is served only by the local police of that municipality
  • Cannot command arrest by “any police officer” statewide
  • Cannot set cash bail
  • Cannot threaten criminal booking or detention
  • Is never entered into NCIC as a criminal warrant

Glen Ridge’s document does all of the above — and then threatens Naomi with arrest anywhere in New Jersey and full criminal processing over two $55 tickets.

That makes this piece of paper not just void — it makes it a fraudulent official document and a willful deprivation of rights under color of law.

Every single time a Glen Ridge clerk prints this, every time Judge Clemente signs it, and every time a prosecutor allows it to remain active, they are committing a fresh violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and New Jersey’s official misconduct statute (N.J.S.A. 2C:30-2).

This isn’t a warrant. This is a forged criminal arrest warrant issued by a court that has no more authority to issue one than your local DMV.

And as long as it remains in the system against Minster Naomi Johnson, a disabled Black woman who dared to know the law, the Borough of Glen Ridge is running an active, ongoing constitutional tort out of a municipal building in Essex County.

Here's the notice, word-for-word, as received:

Notice of Warrant for Arrest Issued on May 14, 2025 Police Department: [Glen Ridge Police Department, Agency Code 0708] State vs. Naomi Johnson Violation: 39:3-4 – Driving or Parking Unregistered Motor Vehicle Bail Amount: $500 Plate No.: NJ HV Summons: E25 Race: B – Black or African American Police Agency: 0708

This isn't a warrant. It's a void administrative notice for a civil infraction under N.J.S.A. 39:3-4—a strict-liability motor vehicle violation carrying a maximum $55 fine and no jail time (N.J.S.A. 39:4-203; Statewide Violations Bureau Schedule). Yet Glen Ridge inflated it into a $500 cash-bail arrest threat, complete with racial profiling on the face (explicitly noting "B – Black or African American" in a system designed to flag "flight risks" based on bias).

Break it down:

  1. The Underlying Violation Is Civil, Not Criminal: N.J.S.A. 39:3-4 requires vehicle registration before highway use—period. It's a payable Title 39 infraction, not an indictable offense. Municipal courts handle these as administrative matters, not criminal prosecutions (State v. Scotus, 114 N.J. 327 (1989)). No "arrest warrant" authority exists here—only a local bench warrant under R. 7:8-9, limited to the issuing municipality.
  2. Jurisdictional Fraud from Day One: As exposed earlier, Sgt. Anthony Mazza issued this summons (E25) during a stop in Montclair, not Glen Ridge. Agency code 0708 confirms Glen Ridge PD (Essex County identifier), but Mazza had no territorial authority in Montclair without a mutual-aid agreement (N.J.S.A. 40A:14-152; State v. Gadsden, 303 N.J. Super. 491 (App. Div. 1997)). The ticket is void ab initio, meaning the court never had power to issue any notice, let alone this one.
  3. The "Bail" Is Illegal Coercion: For Title 39 failures-to-appear, NJ law allows only license suspension or a local enforcement request, not $500 cash bail or statewide arrest threats (N.J.S.A. 39:4-139.11; R. 7:12-4). This notice commands arrest by "any police officer," mimicking a criminal warrant. But municipal courts lack that power for civil tickets (State v. Gonzalez, 114 N.J. 592 (1989)). It's false imprisonment under color of law (42 U.S.C. § 1983).
  4. Racial and Disability Discrimination Baked In: Explicitly logging Naomi's race ("B") in a warrant system riddled with bias, while ignoring her documented disability, screams profiling. This compounds Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendment violations with ADA non-compliance and equal-protection failures.

Six months later (as of December 1, 2025), this notice remains active in the NJ Judiciary's Municipal Court Case Search, flagged against plate NJ HV**** and Naomi's name. Every day it's enforced is a new act of official misconduct (N.J.S.A. 2C:30-2).

Bottom Line: What Judge Clemente issued is not a warrant. This "notice" isn't law—it's a scam on letterhead. Glen Ridge knows it's ultra vires (beyond their power) under Scotus and 35+ years of precedent. Yet they mailed it to coerce compliance from someone who dared challenge their overreach. It is a legally impotent piece of municipal stationery, an administrative bluff printed on letterhead, designed to extract money from people who don’t know the difference between a constitutional court and a kangaroo tribunal.

Minister Johnson isn't running. She's fighting—for her rights, and for every Black, disabled New Jerseyan targeted by this municipal machine. The feds in Newark are watching. How long before they act?

Glen Ridge's Blatant Overreach: Unpacking Sgt. Mazza's Montclair Ticket and the Warrant It Spawned With One Rogue Ticket, Zero Jurisdiction And Eight Months of Terror

It all started with a single unlawful traffic citation written by Glen Ridge Police Sergeant Anthony Mazza, in Montclair, New Jersey, where he has no jurisdiction, no mutual-aid agreement, and no legal authority whatsoever.

  • Let’s unpack this step by step and shine a bright light on the Borough of Glen Ridge Police Department’s blatant abuse of power.

    In early 2025, Sgt. Mazza stopped Minister Naomi Johnson while she was driving through Glen Ridge into Montclair. He then knowingly issued two Title 39 summonses falsely claiming the violations occurred inside Glen Ridge limits.

    That single act of jurisdictional fraud is the foundation of everything illegal that followed:

    • Void tickets → void court summons → void “failure to appear” → void “bench warrant”

    New Jersey law could not be clearer: a police officer acting outside his territorial jurisdiction has no authority to issue an enforceable traffic ticket (see State v. Gadsden, 303 N.J. Super. 491 (App. Div. 1997); N.J.S.A. 40A:14-152).

    Yet Sgt. Mazza wrote the tickets anyway. The Glen Ridge Municipal Court clerk accepted them anyway.

    One officer’s lie has now morphed into an eight-month-long municipal manhunt against a disabled Black minister and journalist who simply refused to submit to an unlawful proceeding.

    This is consider abuse of process, official misconduct, and a continuing civil-rights violation, all traceable to the moment Sgt. Anthony Mazza decided the rules don’t apply to him.

    This is how the unlawful warrant started, with one bad cop, one forged ticket, and an entire borough willing to turn a blind eye rather than admit they never had jurisdiction in the first place.

  • No Territorial Jurisdiction: Sgt. Mazza's own body-cam audio (timestamp 26:19) proves the stop occurred in Montclair, not Glen Ridge. Municipal courts have no power over out-of-town offenses (N.J.S.A. 2B:12-16).
To read about Sergeant Mazza constitutional violation against Naomi, please click the link.  https://noneillahtalkshow.blogspot.com/2025/11/citizen-shines-light-talk-show-host.html


Here is video he that Glen Ridge Sgt. Mazza talking on the radio saying he is pulling Naomi over in Montclair, which he has no jurisdiction over.
This is Glen Ridge Sgt. Anthony Mazza typed on the ticket that he pulled Naomi over in Glen Ridge, so he can have jurisdiction over the lawless behavior. On another video you see Mazza printing the traffic ticket citation in Montclair. He ran Naomi's licence plate number before he stopped her. He had no legal grounds to type or issue a traffic citation to the black disable woman, Naomi. 

Here is the towing impound invoice that shows Naomi’s conveyance was illegally towed in Montclair, where Glen Ridge police officer Sgt. Anthony have no jurisdiction to enforce traffic laws or issue summonses outside the territorial limits of the Borough of Glen Ridge (see N.J.S.A. 40A:14-152; State v. Cohen, 73 N.J. 84 (1977)).

(Clip shows officer stating stop in Montclair despite Glen Ridge citation).

In this body camera video, you can hear Sgt. Anthony Mazza tell Naomi he had to tow her car. He towed her car in Montclair, NJ, which is outside his jurisdiction. (Policy Regarding Use of Body Worn Cameras)

The towing company had no jurisdiction or consent from Naomi to tow her car. The towing company got its approval from Borough of Glen Ridge Police Sgt. Anthony Mazza to tow this disabled woman’s car and leave her to walk home. Mazza never obtained a judicial warrant to tow Naomi’s conveyance.

The SOP says that private citizens have 24 hours to bring in their license, registration, and insurance. If the citizen does not bring the documents within that time, the police must get a warrant to tow the car. State v. Vreeland, 172 N.J. Super. 141 (App. Div. 1980)-Municipal police lack authority for Title 39 enforcement (including stops and tows) outside their territorial jurisdiction; any traffic ticket citation or tow is void ab initio. Mazza's tow in Montclair is invalid due to no Glen Ridge jurisdiction. The towing company cannot claim "approval" from an unauthorized officer. No summons should have been issued in Naomi’s name.

Because the summons was issued without territorial jurisdiction, it is void ab initio. A municipal court acquires jurisdiction only over valid complaints filed within its territorial limits (R. 7:2-1; State v. Vreeland, 172 N.J. Super. 141 (App. Div. 1980)).

  1. Now, if Sgt. Mazza had no jurisdiction to issue Naomi a ticket, it means that Borough of Glen Ridge Municipal Judge Mark had no jurisdiction to issue a warrant for a ticket that did not exist. The Glen Ridge Municipal Court (Judge Mark Clemente) never acquired jurisdiction over the matter. Any bench warrant issued for failure to appear on a void summons is likewise invalid.
  2. It means that Prosecutor Elizabeth had no jurisdiction over the matter; therefore, the ticket should have been dismissed, The prosecutor (Elizabeth Brewster) had no authority to prosecute a void summons. 
  3. Any payment demanded or collected by the court clerk or violations bureau (Denise C. Iandolo) for this void summons constitutes an unlawful exaction. It means that the administrative court clerk/violations clerk Denise had no legal ground to force Naomi to pay for an unlawful ticket.
  • No Subject-Matter Jurisdiction: Title 39 violations are civil, not criminal. Treating them as warrant-worthy crimes is a fraud upon the court (State v. Gonzalez, 114 N.J. 592 (1989)).

Listen closely to this video. You can hear Borough of Glen Ridge Police Sgt. Anthony Mazza say the crime is a motor vehicle. Now, a motor vehicle infraction falls under N.J. MVC Title 39, which is civil, not criminal. It is not a crime, as Mazza stated to this disabled Black woman.

N.J.S.A. 2C:1-4 – Classes of Offenses

  • Overview: The New Jersey Criminal Code (Title 2C) defines “crimes” as offenses classified as first-degree, second-degree, third-degree, or fourth-degree crimes, or disorderly persons offenses. Motor vehicle infractions under Title 39 are not classified as crimes unless they involve specific conduct, such as driving under the influence (N.J.S.A. 39:4-50) or vehicular homicide (N.J.S.A. 2C:11-5).
  • N.J.S.A. 39:4-50 – Driving While Intoxicated (DUI)
    • Overview: DUI is an exception to the general rule that Title 39 violations are civil. While prosecuted under Title 39, DUI is considered a “quasi-criminal” offense due to its potential for significant penalties, including jail time, and is treated with criminal-like procedural protections (e.g., right to counsel).
    • Application: If the infraction in question was not DUI or a similar quasi-criminal offense (e.g., reckless driving under N.J.S.A. 39:4-96), it would not be a crime. Without specifics on the infraction, most Title 39 violations remain civil.
  • N.J.S.A. 39:5-30.5 – Motor Vehicle Points System
    • Overview: This statute governs the assignment of points to a driver’s license for Title 39 violations, such as careless driving (N.J.S.A. 39:4-97, 2 points) or speeding (N.J.S.A. 39:4-98, variable points). Points are an administrative penalty, not a criminal sanction.
    • Application: The points system reinforces that most Title 39 infractions are civil/administrative, not criminal, as they affect driving privileges rather than criminal records
    • State v. Hamm, 121 N.J. 109 (1990)
      • Holding: The New Jersey Supreme Court clarified that motor vehicle violations under Title 39, such as speeding or careless driving, are not “crimes” but civil infractions unless they involve conduct that triggers criminal liability (e.g., DUI or vehicular homicide). The court emphasized that Title 39 violations are adjudicated in municipal courts as civil matters, with fines and administrative penalties rather than criminal convictions.
    According to MVC and N.J.S.A. Sgt. Mazza had misapplied the law so he can have a reason to stop Naomi, give her a ticket and tow her car. A standard motor vehicle infraction is not a crime.

    In this video, you can hear Sgt. Anthony Mazza saying he had probable cause to pull this Black disabled woman, Naomi, over. He said that because he saw it, which is good. Now, for all those who took up criminal law or criminal investigation process practices and principles, you would know that probable cause is associated with a crime, not a civil violation under Title 39.

    Probable cause (a higher standard) is required for arrests, searches, or when escalating to criminal matters (e.g., if the stop uncovers evidence of a Title 2C crime like drug possession or DUI under N.J.S.A. 39:4-50, which is quasi-criminal). Mazza calling it "probable cause" misapplies criminal terminology to a civil violation, potentially tainting the encounter

    These New Jersey Supreme Court and Appellate Division decisions affirm that reasonable suspicion suffices for Title 39 civil stops, while probable cause is for criminal contexts. They draw from U.S. Supreme Court precedents like Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) (reasonable suspicion for investigative stops) and Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806 (1996) (observed traffic violation = probable cause for stop, but NJ follows a nuance for civil infractions).

    • No Personal Jurisdiction or Due Process: No notice of hearing was sent (required by Rule 7:2-3). Naomi filed a Motion to Show Cause and Notice to Vacate before the warrant issued – ignored. Service? Regular mail – unconstitutional (Greene v. Lindsey, 456 U.S. 444 (1982)). She learned of it via Lt. Timothy Faranda's email, not lawful process.

    The Glen Ridge Court did not have personal jurisdiction over Naomi, meaning no jurisdiction over her body. In order for the court to have jurisdiction over Naomi, she would have to go to court and give the judge consent. Naomi asked the judge, prosecutor, and administrative court clerk/violations clerk, by means of a Notice to Show Cause of jurisdiction. In order for a court to hear a case, it must have three jurisdictions—not one, not two jurisdictions; it must have all three. New Jersey courts must have all three to proceed (N.J. Const. art. VI, § III, ¶ 2; State v. Baird, 224 N.J. Super. 374 (App. Div. 1988)). But territorial is foundational for municipal/traffic cases—if missing, the others collapse.

    State v. Vreeland, 172 N.J. Super. 141 (App. Div. 1980)- A municipal court lacks jurisdiction over a motor vehicle summons if the offense occurred outside its territorial boundaries. The summons is void ab initio (from the beginning), and any subsequent warrant or proceedings are invalid.

    State v. Cohen, 73 N.J. 84 (1977)-Police and municipal courts have no authority to enforce or adjudicate Title 39 violations outside their territorial jurisdiction (N.J.S.A. 40A:14-152). Personal jurisdiction requires proper summons service but does not hinge on defendant consent.

    So, Glen Ridge did not have any delegated consent to issue any warrant. The court cannot proceed on anyone’s case if it does not have any consent.



    You can see in Judge Mark Clemente’s letter to Naomi that he put “State of New Jersey vs. Naomi Johnson.” Judge Mark also wrote that Naomi received the warrant for not appearing in court.

    On another line in his letter, he then said it had been brought to his attention that Naomi does not have to appear in court.

    Then he said that if she comes to court, the warrant will go away and he will treat it as Naomi’s first appearance.

    Then he said that if she wants to pay for the traffic citation online, she should make an arrangement with his staff.

    The judge told Naomi that the only accommodation he has is that she can access the court from the back of the library as a disabled woman. He is trying to get her into court while an active warrant that he issued is still outstanding so that he can arrest her. In the letter, he admitted that he received Naomi’s Motion to Quash the unlawful warrant, Notice to Vacate the traffic citation, Motion to Show Cause, her affidavit, and other documents.

    The judge said he would address the documents when she appears in court.

    Naomi wrote back to the judge. She informed him that she will not appear until the court first provides the information she requested in her Notice/Motion to Show Cause.

    She specifically demanded:

    • a sworn proof of affidavit,
    • any documents showing that she injured someone,
    • proof of a binding contract between her and the “natural woman/man,” and
    • proof of the court’s jurisdiction.

    She explained that she needs these documents before appearing so she can properly represent herself.

    According to the law, if the case is criminal, a defendant has the right to face the accuser. If the case is civil, a defendant has the right to see the alleged contract. If the court cannot produce its case, the matter must be dismissed.

    The court has never provided any of this evidence.

    Naomi also informed the judge in her letter that she does not believe she can receive a fair hearing because he and the prosecutor are both members of the same Bar association and there is no neutral party.

    State v. Tull, 234 N.J. Super. 486 (App. Div. 1989)-Prosecutorial failure to provide full discovery in municipal court warrants sanctions, including dismissal or evidence suppression, if prejudicial. Courts must address pre-trial. If no evidence of "injury" or jurisdiction provided, dismiss—state bears burden in civil Title 39. State v. Hammond, 121 N.J. 109 (1990)- Title 39 civil violations lack full criminal protections (e.g., no 6th Amendment confrontation right); discovery is administrative, but state must disclose upon request to ensure due process. No "accuser" to face in traffic cases (officer testifies if needed); civil "contract" claim invalid—dismissal if state cannot prove elements pre-hearing. State v. Cohen, 73 N.J. 84 (1977)-Jurisdictional challenges (e.g., Motion to Show Cause) must be resolved pre-trial; deferral without ruling violates due process. Judge must provide jurisdictional proof (e.g., territorial under N.J.S.A. 2B:12-16) before requiring appearance; failure to address warrants dismissal. Grabowsky v. Township of Montclair, 221 N.J. Super. 564 (App. Div. 1987-Summary actions (like Title 39) require pre-hearing affidavits/evidence if motion demands; failure to provide leads to dismissal if no genuine issue exists. For Show Cause, court must supply case elements pre-trial; no automatic dismissal without motion, but supports Naomi's request for self-representation prep.

    As you can read my information that shows that the judge had no jurisdiction over Naomi paying for an unlawful traffic citation or over the warrant that should never have been signed by him in Naomi’s name.

    • No Required Appearance: Judge Clemente admitted in his July 25 email: "The tickets do not necessarily require an appearance." Issuing a warrant for a non-mandatory act is ultra vires – an illegal overreach (State v. Dangerfield, 201 N.J. 151 (2010)).

    Bench warrants in NJ have no expiration for civil matters like this, lingering indefinitely until quashed – which is why it's still active today, terrorizing Naomi with arrest fears during job hunts, medical visits, and daily life. It's a sword of Damocles, designed to coerce payment from those who can't afford lawyers or time off.

    The Human Cost: A Grieving Mother's Nightmare

    Naomi Johnson isn't a "defendant" – she's a survivor. Ordained minister. Host of the Noneillah Talk Show. A Black woman with chronic pain, nerve damage, anxiety, depression, and PTSD – documented by Social Security Disability, neurology reports, and nurse practitioner notes. Her only child was murdered by an NJ Transit/Coach USA bus driver; Essex County prosecutors buried the case.

    For what? A fabricated stop in the wrong town. Groceries spoiled in impound. $575 in predatory tow fees. Walked home in freezing cold, missing therapy, tremors flaring. And now? An active warrant that brands her a criminal for a civil ticket she never owed.

    Glen Ridge's machine – from Mazza's racial "(B)" notation (illegal under AOC Directive #02-07) to Clemente's coercive email ("Pay online and the warrant goes away") – reeks of systemic bias. They ignored her ADA pleas (library access? For someone who can't walk without pain?). Ignored her motions. Treated Title 39 as a felony to extract cash from a disabled Black woman.

    This is Monell liability in action: a municipal policy of jurisdictional overreach, racial profiling, and disability discrimination (42 U.S.C. § 1983; NJLAD N.J.S.A. 10:5-1 et seq.).

    Call to Action: End This Now

    • Quash It: File a Motion to Recall/Quash under Rule 7:4-4 at Glen Ridge Municipal Court (3 Herman St., Glen Ridge, NJ 07028; 973-748-5400). Demand proof of jurisdiction – they can't provide it.
    • Check Your Own Status: Use NJMCDirect or PROMIS/Gavel for traffic/municipal warrants.
    • Amplify & Report: Share Naomi's story. Contact US DOJ Civil Rights Division, ACLU-NJ, and Essex County Prosecutor Theodore N. Stephens II. This demands federal intervention.

    Naomi's rights aren't optional. Her life isn't collateral for your revenue racket. Share it. Post it. Send it to every news outlet, every civil-rights group, and every federal oversight agency in the country. Because if they can do this to Naomi Johnson, they can do it to anyone. We're watching. The nation soon will be.

    (These redacted public records are shared for transparency and administrative remedy; they do not waive claims in pending federal litigation).

    #ActiveWarrantScandal #QuashTheFraud #GlenRidgeInjustice #JusticeForNaomi #EndMunicipalExtortion

    #SecretWarrant #NoNoticeNoDueProcess #GlenRidgeKangarooCourt #VoidFromTheJump

    #NotARealWarrant #AdministrativeExtortion #QuasiJudicialFraud #GlenRidgeExposed

    #NoneillahTalkShow

    #GlenRidgeInjustice #

    EndQualifiedImmunity

    #ADAviolations

    #NoJurisdictionNoWarrant

    #ForgedTicket #VoidAbInitio #NoJurisdictionNoWarrant #ADAViolationOnItsFace


    Clemente

    Mark Clemente
    Judge of Municipal Court

    Denise C. Iandolo
    Municipal Court Administrator
    Violations Clerk

    Eliabeth Brewster, Esq.
    Borough Prosecutor


    Here is more evidence. 

    Click here to read more about Lieutenant role in violating Naomi's right https://noneillahtalkshow.blogspot.com/2025/11/breaking-noneillah-talk-show-host-naomi.html



    Here is proof that Naomi did not know about the warrant was issue in Naomi's name. Naomi learned about the warrant via email from Glenridge police department Lt. Timothy. 


                            Sean Quinn, failed to address complaints provided by Naomi.
    You can read more about Sean violation against Naomi https://noneillahtalkshow.blogspot.com/2025/11/noneillah-talk-show-host-naomi-johnson.html







    You can read more about Daniel role in this case https://noneillahtalkshow.blogspot.com/2025/11/host-naomi-johnson-files-formal.html

    The Oath Clause Article 4 Clause 3 states that all executive and judicial offers of the United States and of the several states shall be bound by oath or affirmation to support this constitution.

    All of these government officials should be loyal to the New Jersey and United States Constitutions, not to statutes, ordinances, MVC rules, procedures, policies, and other lawless acts by public servants. This is how our constitutional republic works. We the People have to stand up for the Constitution, just as Naomi is doing. We must hold these Glen Ridge government actors accountable for their actions against Naomi—the judge, the prosecutor, the administrative court clerk/violations clerk, the police officers, and the others who are not named in this write-up.


    You can read more about Glen Ridge misconduct: 

    Glen Ridge, NJ Lawsuits Involving Police and Municipal Entities https://noneillahtalkshow.blogspot.com/2025/11/sgt-merritt-carr-v-borough-of-glen.html



    MERRITT CARR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOROUGH OF GLEN RIDGE, Defendant-Respondent, and SHEILA BYRON-LAGATTUTA, PAUL A. LISOCVICZ, MICHAEL ROHAL, SEAN QUINN AND TIMOTHY FARANDA,




    "These are redacted public records obtained via OPRA/NJMCDirect."


    Public Records: Naomi Johnson

    v.

    Glen Ridge Police Department Evidence of Unlawful Traffic Stop and Towing – Montclair, New Jersey

    December 2, 2025

    I am making the following **redacted public records** available for transparency and to document my ongoing efforts to obtain a proper internal affairs investigation.

    **Summary of Events**

    Monday, February 24, 2025

    On Feb, Glen Ridge Police Sergeant Anthony Mazza conducted a traffic stop and ordered my vehicle towed **entirely within the Town of Montclair**, where Glen Ridge officers have no jurisdiction (N.J.S.A. 40A:14-152). The citations issued list the location as Glen Ridge. My vehicle contained perishable food and medication and I am disabled (handicap placard displayed). I was left stranded.

    **Redacted Public Records (click to view or download)** 1. Traffic Citation – lists location as Glen Ridge 2. Towing Receipt – clearly states vehicle removed from Montclair 3. Body-Worn Camera Clips (key segments only) - Sgt. Mazza radioing “pulling over in Montclair” - Sgt. Mazza stating he has “probable cause” and calling the stop a “crime” - Sgt. Mazza ordering tow while still in Montclair 4. Glen Ridge Internal Affairs Summary by Lt. Faranda 5. Email confirming active bench warrant issued on void citations

    **Current Status** - December 2, 2025: Formal Notice with all new evidence sent to Essex County Prosecutor’s Professional Standards Bureau demanding reopening of investigation - Civil rights lawsuit pending in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey

    These documents are shared in redacted form consistent with New Jersey’s Open Public Records Act (OPRA) and the common-law right of access. No private medical details or unredacted personal identifiers are included.

    Questions may be directed to naomi.johnson.public@gmail.com

    Thank you for helping ensure accountability and transparency.

    Comments

    Post a Comment