AFFIDAVIT OF NON-RESPONSE

on

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 

Naomi Johnson, Sui Juris, as one of the People of the Constitution, Plaintiff, v. Glen Ridge Township, et al., Defendants. Case No. [Insert Docket Number]

AFFIDAVIT OF NON-RESPONSE

I, Naomi Johnson, sui juris, one of the People under the U.S. Constitution, declare under penalty of perjury (28 U.S.C. § 1746):

  1. Between March 1, 2025, and September 27, 2025, I served Defendants (Glen Ridge Township, Sgt. Anthony Maza, Lt. Thomas, Judge [Name], Prosecutor [Name], Clerk [Name], State of NJ) via certified mail with: a. Affidavit of Rebuttal (March 1, 2025; tracking: [Insert]). b. Affidavit of Acquiescence (March 15, 2025; tracking: [Insert]). c. Notice to Liability and Cure (April 8, 2025; tracking: [Insert]). d. Motion to Quash Warrant (May 1, 2025; tracking: [Insert]). e. Motion to Vacate Tickets (May 1, 2025; tracking: [Insert]). f. Demand for Jurisdiction, Contract, Injured Party, Commercial Use (June 1, 2025; tracking: [Insert]).

  2. No Defendant responded, admitting truth per 16 Am. Jur. 2d § 155 (estoppel by silence) and maxim “Qui tacet consentire videtur.”

  3. My court of record is public at [Soulality Blog/Legal Share URLs], admissible under Fed. R. Evid. 803(8). Non-response violates due process (Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank, 339 U.S. 306 (1950)) and NJ rules (R. 7:8-9).

  4. I request a paper ruling (D.N.J. L. Civ. R. 78.1(b)) due to disability (tremors, 49 CFR § 37.3).

Dated: October 8, 2025 /s/ Naomi Johnson Sui Juris, Newark, NJ

Comments

Post a Comment