THE PEOPLE’S NOTICE OF AWARENESS BETWEEN CERTIORARI AND ACTIONS OF RIGHT

THE PEOPLE’S NOTICE OF AWARENESS BETWEEN CERTIORARI AND ACTIONS OF RIGHT

Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal and Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent

I, one of the People (as seen in the 50 States Constitutions), Sui Juris, and exercising powers over all government as entities created by the People, do present you the following notice that you and your agents may provide immediate due care;

Please take notice that the People have created the Judiciary inside of our Constitutions, be it the 50 states or federal constitutions, and that all servants of government are trustees and servants of the People, and are here for the People’s benefit; And

Please take notice that using Certiorari to make decisions on which cases the Supreme Court may hear based on their discretion is not the same as the service owed to the People by right; And

Please take notice that the historical purposes of judges and courts included the duty to provide relief to those who were wrongly oppressed, affected in a right or liberty, and this was by right and without cost, denial or delay. Therefore, Magistrates as trustees, are without excuse to sit back and watch the People get attacked with methods not in line with constitutions and not allow beneficiaries of the trust (the People) to know their right to standing and quick redress of wrongs, especially when bad actors in unlawful tribunals have taken property and liberty without any lawful grant of authority and are using tribunals that are void, invalid, unlawful and without power to make Judicial Judgments that are protected by methods laid out in the 50 State Constitutions and Federal Constitution (Please see evidence below):

Maxim: Where the law prescribes a form, the non observance of it is fatal to the proceeding, and the whole becomes a nullity. Best, Ev.Introd. s, 59.

Maxim:The main object of government is the protection and preservation of personal rights, private property and public liberties, and upholding the law of God. American Maxim

Please take notice that the People have recognized a pattern of practice where government officers refuse to show grants of authority for actions taken in order to remove the rights, liberties and properties of the People, while higher tribunals block access to justice and turn a blind eye to the lack of constitutionally mandated tribunals used by agencies and bureaucrats. Therefore, I as one of the People present the following remedy, by necessity; And

It is my wish, order and command that the Clerk of, or the Officers of the Supreme Court reveal that the People have the power to use the Supreme Court that they created when they are attacked by agencies, public ministers, or State actors without lawful due process based on the settled maxims. Furthermore, is it my wish for the Supreme Court to accept any affidavits of one of the People whereby evidence is presented that shows that the State or any of its actors are attacking the People with methods that are not those mandated by the State and Federal Constitution. And, if the State or Public Minister shall fail to present standing to attack one of the People by the fundamental law or Constitution, the Supreme Court shall allow the party making the affidavit to carry out the case Ex Parte and the Supreme Court shall give justice and relief and prevent clerks from interfering with the People’s right to access their courts. If you believe the People do not have this power and right, please declare where any court or government officer is granted the power to deny the People access to guaranteed protections of the Constitutions within 5 (five) days, sworn under the penalty of perjury, or you agree that the People do have these rights. This notice is sent to you in the peace and love of Christ.

To: President Donald Trump

To: Elon Musk

To: Pam Bondi

From:

 

Notice of Demand to Immediately Create a Department of Restoration of the People

Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal and Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent

 

I, one of the People (As seen in the 50 State Constitutions), having all political power, Sui Juris, do present you with this notice that you may provide immediate due care to the People;

Please take notice that the people have assembled and come together in realization that all executive branch agencies that have attacked the People without due process of law, using various federal programs, which were without constitutional authority and not following the law, as defined in the Blacks Law 5th edition definition presented below, using maxims of law, were unconstitutional and harmed the People:

Due Process of Law -Black’s 5th edition excerpt: Law in its regular course of administration through courts of justice. Due process of law in each particular case means such an exercise of the powers of the government as the settled maxims of law permit and sanction, and under the safeguards for the protection of individual rights as those maxims prescribe for the class of cases to which the one in question belongs. A course of legal proceedings according to those rules and principles which have been established in our systems of jurisprudence for the enforcement and protection of private rights. To give such proceedings any validity, there must be a tribunal competent by its constitution-that is, by the law of its creation-to pass upon the subject-matter of the suit; and, if that involves merely a determination of the personal liability of the defendant, he must be brought within its jurisdiction by service of process within the state, or his voluntary appearance. Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U.S. 733, 24 I., Ed. 565. Due process of law implies the right of the person affected thereby to be present before the tribunal which pronounces judgement upon the question of life, liberty, or property, in its most comprehensive sense; to be heard, by testimony or otherwise, and to have the right of controverting, by proof, every material fact which bears on the question of right in the matter involved. If any question of fact or liability be conclusively presumed against him this is not due process of law.

Please take notice that as a servant, the People realize that in President Trump's pursuit of correcting injustices, many state court tribunals used cases against him that didn’t follow the fundamental principles of law. The People have assembled and agreed that we will not tolerate unlawful attacks on our servants who are seeking justice. Therefore, we demand that President Trump's cases be investigated to prove that all cases against him were conducted in accordance with the settled maxims and that prosecutions be brought against all actors who have taken jurisdiction that belongs to no Legislator, Court or Tribunal, as it is unjust for any Court to allow cases to move against fundamental law and without jurisdiction. President Trump is the People’s servant. As such, the People wish to allow him to use his time to serve us by uncovering and correcting all wrongs. It is the wish of the People that government officers who seek to use tribunals to unlawfully prosecute be made to present affidavits swearing to first hand knowledge of any alleged wrongdoings. If they are found to be guilty of prosecutorial misconduct they must suffer like punishment that our servant may receive based on the maxims listed below:

Maxim: The punishment due to a crime of which one falsely accuses another should be inflicted upon the perjured informer. C.L.M.

Please take notice that we the People hold President Trump as a faithful servant and realize that the constant attacks against him that are not following law are being used by other government servants to interfere with policies, production, duty and obligation of President Trump as ordered by the People and the following text is necessary to be understood:

Bible Support:

 

Romans 14:4

"Who art thou that judgest another man's servant? to his own master he standeth or falleth."

 

It is therefore the wish, order and demand of the People that President Trump makes preparation for the People’s benefit, for those who have been unlawfully attacked by agency actions in connection with any federal program or agency action that has been shown to not follow the fundamental maxims of law. Affidavits of such wrongs will be sent to President Trump with the Demand of $100,000 per day if these documents are ignored and Restoration is not provided. If President Trump can’t rebut these affidavits, remedy and justice may be had by immediately making an executive order, creating a Department of Restoration, which demands that People receive immediate redress of grievance within 40 days of receipt of Affidavit. Furthermore, investigations of all federal, state and county agencies that have failed to rebut with maxims of law must show that they used lawful authority to attack one of the People, in any program or in concert with any agency of government, must be initiated forthwith. President Trump, it is our wish to thank you for correcting bad government actors by finding and releasing wrongs that have been done against the trust reposed in them. The People, knowing that you are releasing information regarding unlawful actions committed by government officials, do bring forth this issue with the intention that you will spend your time giving redress, which is one of the original purposes of government. This notice is sent to you in the peace and love of Christ.

Notice and Demand for Immediate Clarity on Requirement for filing a 1040 in Original or Fundamental Law

 

Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal and Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent

 

I, one of the People (as seen in the 50 states constitutions), Sui Juris, do provide you with due notice that you may immediately present clarity to the People of America, and cause you and your agents to handle law appropriately;

Please take notice that we the People, thank you president Trump for initiating an Executive Order that compels you and the Attorney General to reclaim communicating to the People what the law is in accordance with the historical context of this nation. Furthermore, as you have claimed your rightful authority and the liability and weight of the same, it is my wish that you and the Attorney General give clarity with citation from the actual law for the existence of the following:

• Please show the Original Legislative Act that requires the American People fill out and submit a 1040 to an agency called the IRS

• Please show and declare if the Legislature enacted, with their authority, Title 26. (Please check the House.gov office of law revision Counsel to see if Title 26 is a Positive Law or an Editorial Compilation)

Please publicly make statements to the People and create an Executive Order to instruct any IRS agent to cease and desist collection or enforcement if you are not able to find and produce legitimate law to show the People this obligation. Please know that legislative tribunals that created orders for the People based on things not supported by the common law do not stand, as evidenced by the maxim below:

Maxim: Things derogatory to the common law are not to be drawn into precedent.

Dear President Trump, you are showing yourself as an excellent servant, being used by God to restore this great nation, this notice is sent to you in the peace and love of Christ.

Notice and Demand For Declaration of Lawfulness Regarding Grand Juries being Hidden from the People to Protect Administrative Actors and Judges (Administrative Law)

 Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal and Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent

 

I, one of the People (as seen in the 50 states constitutions), Sui Juris, do provide you with due notice that you may immediately present clarity to the People of America, and cause you and your agents to handle law appropriately;

Please take notice that we the People have assembled and realized that many administrative actors, working in federal executive agency programs have been partnering in the states to harm the People and then preventing the People from getting redress by blocking or hiding access to the People’s grand jury. It is the people’s wish for you to publicly answer and give clarity if the grand jury belongs to the People, to use at will when harmed, or does it belong to various bureaucrats, the Bar Associations, and Administrative agents?

Justice Scalia writing for the majority said: In the Supreme Court case of United States v. Williams, 112 S. CT. 1735, 504 U.S. 36, 118 L.Ed.2d 352 (1992)- in relevant parts " The Grand jury is mentioned in the Bills of Rights, but is not in the body of the Constitution. It has not been textual assigned therefore, to any of the branches described in the first three Articles. It is a Constitutional fixture in its own right. In fact, the whole theory of its function is that it belongs to no branch of the institutional government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between the government and the People" "Thus, the citizens have the unbridled right to empanel their Grand juries and present "True Bills" of indictment to a Court, which is then required to commence a criminal proceeding. Our Founding Fathers prescient thereby created a "buffer" the People may rely upon for justice, when public officials, including judges, criminally violate the law." "Recognizing this tradition of independence, we have said the 5th amendments Constitutional guarantee presupposes an investigative body ' acting independently of either prosecuting attorney or judge."

It is my wish, order and demand that if you believe that it is unconstitutional for the People to be blocked from access, that you immediately use the full force of power vested in you to bring swift action against any state, federal or local actors blocking the People from grand jury access and that you make an executive order declaring the same post haste. Please respond with appropriate action within 7 days. This notice is sent to you in the peace and love of Christ.

MEMORIAL: Judicial Duty & Constitutional Law

This memorial is not a request. It is a lawful declaration of constitutional truth and judicial obligation. It reminds every officer of government that their authority begins and ends with the Constitution. Where there is no jurisdiction, there is no judge. Where there is no due process of law, there is no lawful power.

This 7-page document is designed to accompany your notices or stand alone as its own lawful record. It corrects the record, clarifies the limits of government power, and affirms that administrative proceedings cannot override the supreme law of the land.

Inside you will find maxims of law, Supreme Court precedent, and foundational principles that judicial officers are sworn to uphold. It also puts officers on notice that continued violation of the Constitution results in personal liability.

This memorial can be used in state or federal filings, attached to tort claims, grand jury evidence, or notices of constitutional controversy. It belongs to the People and affirms that no title or office places anyone above the law.

Use it when the court pretends not to see your rights. Use it when due process has been denied. Use it to remind them that the People created government to secure rights, not to strip them away.

All rights reserved. No waiver of rights or remedies. NO REFUNDS ON THIS DIGITAL PRODUCT

Great — let’s bring the 1776 New Jersey Constitution directly into your memorial record. Since this was the original Constitution of New Jersey (adopted July 2, 1776), I’ll provide the Preamble and selected Articles most relevant to your filings — particularly those establishing government, rights, and oaths.

Here is the original text (faithfully transcribed, with original style/spelling preserved):

Constitution of New Jersey (1776)

Preamble

WHEREAS all the constitutional Authority, ever possessed by the Kings of Great Britain over these Colonies, or their other Dominions, was, by Compact, derived from the People, and held of them for the common Interest of the whole Society;

And whereas the Representatives of the Colony of New Jersey in Congress, by the unanimous Voice of the People, instructed them to consent to the Declaration of Independence; and being conscious, that the Government of this Province is dissolved, and that it is absolutely necessary that the Inhabitants thereof should form a Government, in order to prevent Anarchy, Confusion and Licentiousness, as well as for the Security of their Lives and Property, and the Preservation of Peace and Good Order among them;

WE, the said Delegates, in Convention assembled, therefore, by Virtue of the Authority above mentioned, do ordain, declare and establish the following Charter of Government, to take place on and after the second Tuesday in November next, and to continue in Force until altered by a future Legislature; the said Charter or Form of Government to be, as near as may be, agreeable to the original Constitution of this Colony, and to the Constitution of other free States.

ARTICLE I

That the Government of this Province shall be vested in a Governor, Legislative Council, and General Assembly.

ARTICLE II

That the Governor and Legislative Council shall be chosen jointly, by the Council and Assembly, in the Manner hereinafter mentioned, and shall continue in Office for one Year.

ARTICLE IV

That all Inhabitants of this Colony, of full Age, who are worth fifty Pounds proclamation Money, clear Estate in the same, and have resided within the County in which they claim a Vote for twelve Months immediately preceding the Election, shall be entitled to vote for Representatives in Council and Assembly; and no Person shall be entitled to vote in any other County, than that in which he actually resides at the Time of the Election.

ARTICLE XIX

That the common Law of England, as well as so much of the statute Law, as have heretofore been practiced in this Colony, shall still remain in Force, until they shall be altered by a future Law of the Legislature; such Parts only excepted, as are repugnant to the Rights and Privileges contained in this Charter; and that the inestimable Right of Trial by Jury shall remain confirmed, as a Part of the Law of this Colony, without Repeal, for ever.

ARTICLE XXII

That the Legislature shall, at their first Meeting after the passing of this Constitution, appoint three or more Commissioners in each County, to hear and finally determine Appeals, to be brought by any Person dissatisfied with the Judgment of any Court of Common Pleas, in Causes of small Value; and that no further Appeal shall be admitted, in such Cases.

ARTICLE XXIII

That the Assembly shall not have Power to pass any Act, to repeal or alter any Part of this Constitution.

The full text (all Articles I–XXIII) is preserved here:

• New Jersey State Archives – Constitution of 1776

• Avalon Project – Yale Law School

How this helps your Memorial:

• It shows that New Jersey began with an explicit declaration that government exists only by consent of the people.

• It proves the original Constitution preserved common law, jury trial, and natural rights as unalienable guarantees.

• It strengthens your assertion that government officers are bound to the people’s authority and cannot step outside it without voiding their power.

Would you like me to insert this 1776 text as a historical appendix to your Memorial, so that you have both the 1776 Constitution and the 1947 Constitution side by side to demonstrate continuity of principle?

Supreme Court Notice of Remonstrance and Rebuke as Trustees and Servants

Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent and Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal

[Please provide additional notice to all agents and trustees serving the People by and through the Supreme Court]

I, one of the People,(as seen in the 50 State Constitutions), Sui Juris, do provide you as Trustees of the People, who work in the People’s established court, with this notice of grievance, strong rebuke and remonstrance, and not as a submission of a case. I am exercising the People's guaranteed right of giving notice of wrongdoings so that you may openly show constitutional authority whereby you were granted the power to return, without proper redress, the People’s grievances, instruction, remonstrance or cases that are owed to the People as remedy by right, And

Please take notice that there are guaranteed rights in the Constitutions and that the People wish for you to show in the same Constitutions where Clerks are allowed to interfere with these rights by blocking actions for redress of wrongs done, and where they are allowed to send back notice from the PEOPLE who are the Creators of,and Beneficiaries of Constitutional Trusts?, And

Please take notice that the First Amendment directly negates your Clerks claim that you, as Trustees and Supreme Court Justices are only allowed to take cases presented before you which are properly pled (per your rules and constraints) based on the Constitution. As government servants, you are bound to the People and must be allowed to be apprised of our protests and issues with your failure to act in a manner that is just. (Please see evidence below:)

”Congress Shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievance.” (Emphasis by underline added)

Please take notice that the People, as the beneficiaries of the Trust (the United States Constitution) and as those who are Trust Protectors (holding full power to reform, alter, and abolish government seats and the Constitution, as seen in evidence below) wish for you to show where you were expressly excluded from the right and authority of the People to give you notices, petitions, remonstrance for wrongdoings and breaches of trust against the People.

John Locke Two Treatises of Gov Section 239 excerpt

“And these two cases that the instances differ little from the above mentioned to be destructive to governments, only that he has omitted the principle from which his doctrine flows, and that is the breach of trust in not persevering the form of government agreed on, and in not intending the end of government itself, which is the public good and preservation of property. When a king has dethroned himself, and put himself in a state of war with the people, what shall hinder them from prosecuting him who is no king, as they would other man, who has put himself in a state of war with them…” ( Emphasis by bold added)

Please take notice that the People are not amused by the attempts of Clerks to obstruct the People's access to public servants. Therefore, we wish and demand for the following questions to be answered since Clerks have claimed limits as to what the court can receive per their wrongful interpretation of the Constitution:

1. Where in the Constitution does it grant Clerks or Supreme Court Justices the power to refuse Notice, Grievances, Remonstrances of the People, which are rendered by the People by right?

2. Where in the Constitution did we grant power for actors in the Supreme Court Clerks Office to charge fees for filing a writ of Habeas Corpus, which is a guaranteed right? (If one wishes to argue any act of Legislature, Please see the following definition of Constitutional Right from Blacks law 4th Edition):

CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT. A right guaranteed to the citizens by the Constitution and so guaranteed as to prevent legislative interference therewith. Delaney v. Plunkett, 146 Ga. 547, 91 S.E.561, 567, L.R.A.1917D, 926, Ann.Cas.1917E, 685.

3. If the People are guaranteed the right to redress trespass and harms committed against them, as Trustee’s where are you granted power to deny these rights which are repeatedly declared in State Constitutions? (See evidence below):

Wisconsin Constitution Declaration of Rights:

Text of Section 9: Remedy for Wrongs

"Every person is entitled to a certain remedy in the laws for all injuries, or wrongs which he may receive in his person, property, or character; he ought to obtain justice freely, and without being obliged to purchase it, completely and without denial, promptly and without delay, conformably to the laws.”

Arizona Constitution Declaration of Rights: Article 2 Section Section 11:"Justice in all cases shall be administered openly, and without purchase, completely and without delay."

Colorado Constitution Article II Section 6: ”Courts of justice shall be open to every person, and a speedy remedy afforded for every injury to person, property or character; and right and justice shall be administered without sale, denial or delay.”

Maxim of Law: Justice ought to be free, because nothing is more iniquitous than venal justice; full, because justice out not to be halt; and speedy, because delay is a kind of denial. 2 Inst. 56

Maxim of Law: Justice is neither to be denied nor delayed. Junk. Cent. 76, 93.

Please take notice that as the People, we created the Supreme Court as a court and as a part of justice to correct violations against People that have been harmed. The People have attempted to notify the Supreme Court of such violations committed by lower tribunals that aggrieve the beneficiaries of the Trust called the United States Constitution, only for the clerks to return said grievances without remedy. This power isn’t granted or found in any Constitution, state or federal. Therefore, the People wish to know where the Clerks believe they were granted this authority. Furthermore, the People wish to notify the Supreme Court Judges and Clerks that We, as the People, do recognize this act as a "Breach of Trust.”

Please take notice that administrative actors, not using fundamental law, have attacked us in these States, and as shown with the Bruen case, have been using legislative fiat that is foreign to the law of the Constitutions of the People. When the People submit writs of Mandamus or Habeas Corpus to correct the harms inflicted upon them (uncontroverted by our Affidavits), actors in the Supreme Court Clerks Office wish to demand fees, despite the fact that as the People we are already guaranteed access to the courts by the Constitutions sworn by Supreme Court Justices to uphold and honor. If you believe that this is incorrect, please show where in the Constitution does seeking justice by means of writ of Habeas Corpus or by any other lawful manner, come with a fee or a permission slip for access, allowing the Clerks Office to ignore, delay, deny the People's right to lawful remedy. If one cannot show Constitutional authority for these actions, please let it be known publicly, candidly and clearly, as this shall be understood as a Breach of Trust and just cause for the People to take back their power, as no acts may be committed against the Constitution without the parties committing such acts putting themselves at war with the Constitution that they swore to protect. Please take this notice as being sent in the peace and love of Christ, that you may do those acts which are just, pure and in faith to the Oath you swore to uphold.

Enforcer of Injustice Notice

$40

This Notice puts the final link in the chain of harm on record — the enforcers. It’s not the attorney, bank, or tribunal that seizes your land or removes your body — it’s the sheriff, constable, or marshal acting without lawful authority.

Formulated for California and editable for any state, this 4-page Notice warns of personal liability for enforcing void judgments, unconstitutional orders, or administrative commands. It includes constitutional citations, a fee schedule, and a clear request for the officer to confirm whether they intend to honor their oath or become complicit in harm against the People.

Warn Enforcers : Protect Rights or Face Liability

Hold Attorneys Accountable Notice

$100

This is a ready-to-use Notice to Counsel for when an attorney has filed or maintained a legal action without verified jurisdiction, standing, or lawful authority against one of the People. Often, these actions take place in a legislative tribunal pretending to be a judicial court.

Grounded in:

• [California Code of Civil Procedure §128.7]

• California Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 3.1

• Maxims of law from Charles A. Weisman

This notice puts attorneys on lawful notice that:

• They must prove jurisdiction, contract, and lawful standing.

• They are in violation of procedural and ethical duties if they proceed without evidence.

• They are required to withdraw all filings and motions.

• They must move to seal the case and correct the public record.

Use this if:

• You are being dragged into an unlawful action based on statutory presumption.

• You never consented to administrative procedures.

• The matter is being heard in a legislative tribunal rather than a true judicial forum.

• You want to preserve the record and prepare for future remedy, tort action, or bar complaint.

This version is tailored for California. You can adapt it for your state by updating the statute references to your state’s equivalent. You are also encouraged to put your own energy into the notice and make it yours.

Includes strong constitutional language, a demand for verified evidence, and a powerful closing with maxims of law.

Stand as one of the People. Correct the record. Withdraw consent. Hold them to the law.