Question List – Federal and Human Rights / Civil Liberties
Federal Questions
1. Federal Question 1 – Unlawful Stop & Seizure (42 U.S.C. §1983)
◦ Facts supporting: ¶1–¶20 (police stopped Plaintiff without probable cause, seized vehicle).
◦ Legal Issue: Whether Defendants violated Plaintiff’s Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights by conducting an unlawful stop and seizure.
2. Federal Question 2 – ADA Violations (42 U.S.C. §12132)
◦ Facts supporting: ¶21–¶40 (denial of ADA accommodations, ignoring disability).
◦ Legal Issue: Whether Defendants discriminated against Plaintiff on the basis of disability in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
3. Federal Question 3 – Unlawful Towing & Conversion (42 U.S.C. §1983)
◦ Facts supporting: ¶41–¶55 (tow company seized and held vehicle without consent or court order).
◦ Legal Issue: Whether Defendants unlawfully took, held, or profited from Plaintiff’s property in violation of constitutional rights.
4. Federal Question 4 – Denial of Due Process (42 U.S.C. §1983)
◦ Facts supporting: ¶56–¶70 (court ignored filings, failed to provide hearing, issued administrative warrant without notice).
◦ Legal Issue: Whether Defendants violated Plaintiff’s Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment due process rights.
5. Federal Question 5 – Conspiracy to Deprive Rights (42 U.S.C. §1985)
◦ Facts supporting: ¶71–¶90 (coordination between police, tow company, prosecutor, court clerk to enforce unlawful seizure, conceal jurisdiction, profit from warrant).
◦ Legal Issue: Whether Defendants conspired to deprive Plaintiff of constitutional rights.
6. Federal Question 6 – Misapplication of Statutes / Codes
◦ Facts supporting: ¶91–¶110 (court and police misapplied Title 39, municipal codes, U.S. regulations).
◦ Legal Issue: Whether Defendants violated federal and state laws by misapplying statutes to coerce Plaintiff.
Human Rights / Civil Liberties Questions
7. Human Rights Question 1 – Right to Liberty & Security (UDHR, Articles 3 & 9)
◦ Facts supporting: ¶1–¶20 (unlawful stop, seizure of vehicle, threats of arrest).
◦ Legal Issue: Whether Defendants violated Plaintiff’s right to liberty and security by detaining and threatening her without legal basis.
8. Human Rights Question 2 – Right to Equality & Non-Discrimination (UDHR, Article 7; ICCPR, Article 26)
◦ Facts supporting: ¶41–¶55 (denial of ADA accommodations, ignoring disability, unequal treatment).
◦ Legal Issue: Whether Defendants discriminated against Plaintiff based on disability, violating international human rights standards.
9. Human Rights Question 3 – Right to Property (UDHR, Article 17)
◦ Facts supporting: ¶1–¶20, ¶71–¶80 (seizure of vehicle, misappropriation by tow company).
◦ Legal Issue: Whether Defendants unlawfully interfered with Plaintiff’s property rights without due process or consent.
10. Human Rights Question 4 – Right to Access Justice (UDHR, Article 8; ICCPR, Article 14)
◦ Facts supporting: ¶21–¶40, ¶56–¶70 (court ignored filings, failed to provide hearing, denied remedies).
◦ Legal Issue: Whether Defendants denied Plaintiff access to effective remedies for rights violations.
11. Human Rights Question 5 – Protection from Arbitrary Interference (UDHR, Article 12)
◦ Facts supporting: ¶1–¶20, ¶91–¶100 (police, court, and tow company actions interfering with private property and personal freedom).
◦ Legal Issue: Whether Defendants’ actions constitute arbitrary interference with Plaintiff’s privacy and home.
12. Human Rights Question 6 – Right to Effective Remedy (UDHR, Article 8; ICCPR, Article 2(3))
◦ Facts supporting: ¶56–¶110 (court failed to act on filings, denied Plaintiff a lawful remedy).
◦ Legal Issue: Whether Defendants’ inaction violated Plaintiff’s right to a remedy for rights violations.
Federal Question 1 – Fourth Amendment (Unlawful Stop and Seizure)
• Facts supporting: ¶1–¶20 (police stop without probable cause, seizure of Plaintiff’s vehicle, no warrant, no injured party).
• Legal Issue: Whether Defendants violated the Fourth Amendment by unlawfully stopping and seizing Plaintiff’s private conveyance.
Federal Question 2 – Fourteenth Amendment (Due Process)
• Facts supporting: ¶21–¶40 (court ignored filings, issued unlawful bench warrant, imposed fines without hearing).
• Legal Issue: Whether Defendants deprived Plaintiff of property and liberty without due process, in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Federal Question 3 – ADA Title II (Disability Rights)
• Facts supporting: ¶41–¶55 (Plaintiff forced to walk despite disability, court ignored medical evidence, no ADA accommodations).
• Legal Issue: Whether Defendants discriminated against Plaintiff under Title II of the ADA by denying reasonable modifications and equal access.
Federal Question 4 – First Amendment (Right to Petition Government)
• Facts supporting: ¶56–¶70 (Plaintiff’s notices, motions, and affidavits ignored by court and prosecutor).
• Legal Issue: Whether Defendants violated Plaintiff’s First Amendment right to petition for redress by refusing to respond to her lawful filings.
Federal Question 5 – Eighth Amendment (Excessive Fines & Punishment)
• Facts supporting: ¶71–¶80 (bench warrant with $500 penalty, threats of arrest, disproportionate fines for traffic infractions).
• Legal Issue: Whether Defendants imposed excessive fines and punitive threats in violation of the Eighth Amendment.
Federal Question 6 – Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights (42 U.S.C. §1985)
• Facts supporting: ¶81–¶95 (coordination between police, towing company, prosecutor, and court clerk to enforce unlawful seizure and conceal jurisdiction).
• Legal Issue: Whether Defendants conspired to interfere with Plaintiff’s civil rights by depriving her of liberty and property.
Federal Question 7 – Supremacy Clause (Article VI)
• Facts supporting: ¶96–¶100 (state officials enforced municipal codes in conflict with constitutional protections).
• Legal Issue: Whether Defendants violated the Supremacy Clause by applying statutes and codes in conflict with the U.S. Constitution.
Federal Question 8 – Civil Rights Act (42 U.S.C. §1983)
• Facts supporting: ¶101–¶110 (all Defendants acted under color of law, deprived Plaintiff of constitutional rights, and ignored federal protections).
• Legal Issue: Whether Defendants are liable under 42 U.S.C. §1983 for depriving Plaintiff of rights secured by the Constitution and federal law.
Federal Question 9 – Breach of Constitutional Oath by Police Officers
Facts Supporting: ¶–¶ (Lt. Timothy applied policy instead of law during investigation of Sgt. Mazza; Sgt. Mazza, Lt. Timothy, Chief Sean, and Sgt. Manely swore to uphold NJ and U.S. Constitutions but failed to do so, resulting in unlawful seizure, towing, and denial of due process).
Legal Issue:
• Did Lt. Timothy, Sgt. Mazza, Chief Sean, and Sgt. Manely violate Plaintiff’s constitutional rights by prioritizing internal policy over the law and failing to uphold their sworn constitutional oaths?
• Did their actions constitute a breach of trust, given their duty as public officers to serve the people?
Authorities / Support:
• 42 U.S.C. §1983
• U.S. Constitution – Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments
• Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents
• Common law principles of trust and fiduciary duty
Federal Question 10 – Government Officials Exceeding Authority / Sovereignty of the People
Facts Supporting: ¶–¶ (Officers acted as though they govern the people rather than serve them, enforcing unlawful towing, administrative warrants, and coercion).
Legal Issue:
• Did the officers violate Plaintiff’s federal constitutional rights by exceeding their lawful authority, undermining the sovereignty of the people, and failing to act as trustees of the public trust?
Authorities / Support:
• U.S. Constitution – Bill of Rights, Articles I & III
• 42 U.S.C. §1983
• Marbury v. Madison
• Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents
• Public trust / fiduciary duty principles
Comments
Post a Comment