Notice of Default & Request for Record Entry – Unlawful Warrant and COVER PARAGRAPH – TRUE BILL / FEE SCHEDULE
Notice of Default & Request for Record Entry – Unlawful Warrant
Email To: Dear Denise C. Iandolo,
Let the record show that I am writing in my private capacity, as one of the People, based on the State and United States Constitution.
Let the record show that all filings, motions, notices, and evidence I have submitted to the Glen Ridge Municipal Court from March 2025 through September 5, 2025 are intended to be entered into the official court records.
Let the record further show that all Notices and Motions I certified and served upon the Judge, Prosecutor, and Administrative Court Clerk—specifically demanding removal of the unlawful warrant placed upon my body in May 2025—have not been acted upon. According to the Glen Ridge Municipal Court website, this unlawful warrant remains active. The warrant was not properly served and therefore constitutes a violation of constitutional and statutory due process protections.
For clarity, I have not “failed to pay” or “ignored” the underlying traffic tickets. Rather, I timely filed a rescission, a Motion to Dismiss, a Notice to Show Cause, and subsequent Notices of Default, all of which remain unanswered. The Court has a duty to address jurisdictional challenges and constitutional claims before presuming liability. Payment under threat or coercion does not cure a jurisdictional defect and cannot substitute for due process.
Furthermore, let the record show that the Glen Ridge Municipal Court functions not as a constitutionally established court of record, but as an administrative enforcement arm of the legislature, empowered to execute statutes and policies under Title 39 and related codes. Such tribunals are not Article III or Article VI courts, and they unlawfully combine legislative, executive, and judicial functions in violation of the constitutional separation of powers. A tribunal acting in this capacity cannot lawfully adjudicate vested rights or place a warrant upon the body of a private woman.
This position is consistent with Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England (Book IV, Ch. 27), which provides that no person may be deprived of liberty or property except by lawful process and that courts have no authority beyond that granted by law. Blackstone further notes that judicial power is distinct from legislative or executive authority and that coercion without lawful process is invalid.
Additionally, established case law reinforces this principle:
-
Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803): Courts may not act beyond their lawful jurisdiction; any action without proper authority is void.
-
Ex Parte Siebold, 100 U.S. 371 (1879): Courts created by statute have only the powers expressly granted by law; they cannot exceed their statutory authority.
-
Londoner v. Denver, 210 U.S. 373 (1908): Due process requires proper notice and an opportunity to be heard before a tribunal can impose fines or obligations.
If the Court maintains that the alleged liability is merely “failure to pay” a statutory traffic fine, please provide evidence of lawful tender that may be used to satisfy such an obligation. Absent such proof, any presumption of payment default is constitutionally and commercially defective.
On September 5, 2025, I certified and mailed the following documents via certified mail:
-
Tort Claim
-
OPRA Requests
-
Copies of traffic tickets, warrant, and correspondence
-
Evidence of Disability
-
Notice of Liability
-
Oath of Office
-
Memorial of Judicial Duty and Constitutional Law Assertion
-
Delegation of Authority
-
Surety / Insurance Bond
-
Other supporting documents
These documents were cc’d to:
-
Glen Ridge Municipal Court: Judge Mark A. Clemente, Prosecutor Elizabeth Brewster, Esq., Clerk Denise C. Iandolo
-
Essex County Municipal Court Administration
Attached is a copy of the September 5, 2025 submission for your convenience.
Please confirm receipt of this correspondence and confirm that it, along with all prior filings submitted since March 2025, has been properly entered into the Court records.
For the record, multiple Notices, Motions, and Demands issued between March and September 2025 required response within ten (10) days. No lawful response has been provided by the Court, the Judge, the Prosecutor, or the Clerk. Silence in the face of sworn affidavits and certified filings constitutes acquiescence and default, and may be interpreted as consent to my claims and challenges. Continued inaction exposes the Court and its officers to potential legal accountability for failure to perform mandated judicial and administrative duties, consistent with the principles outlined in:
-
U.S. Constitution: Articles III, V, XIV; Supremacy Clause
-
American Jurisprudence 2d: Municipal courts are limited jurisdiction tribunals and administrative bodies
-
UCC 1-308 / 1-103: Reservation of rights against coercion
-
Human rights law / treaties: UDHR Art. 10, ICCPR Art. 14
Action Requested:
-
Confirm that all filings from March–September 2025 have been entered into the Court records.
-
Confirm in writing that the unlawful warrant issued in May 2025 has been removed from my name.
-
Provide a written response within ten (10) days of receipt of this notice.
All certified motions, notices, and evidence submitted remain unacknowledged. The record stands as stated.
Respectfully,
By: Naomi- Johnson, Sui Juris
Private Woman / Beneficial Owner
All Rights Reserved, UCC 1-308
COVER PARAGRAPH – TRUE BILL / FEE SCHEDULE
To: Glen Ridge Municipal Court – Judge Mark A. Clemente, Prosecutor Elizabeth Brewster, Esq., Clerk Denise C. Iandolo
From: Naomi- Johnson, Sui Juris, Private Woman / Beneficial Owner
Date: [Insert Date]
Re: True Bill: Damages for Unlawful Summons – Citation/Infraction #2A0435049 & #2A0435050; Agent Ryan Senger, et al.
Let the record show that the following Fee Schedule / True Bill represents damages, restitution, and penalties assessed for violations of constitutional, statutory, and common law rights resulting from the unlawful issuance of summons, warrant, and related actions. This includes violations of the United States Constitution, New Jersey Constitution, the Americans with Disabilities Act, civil rights statutes, common law rights, and applicable commercial law (UCC § 1-308).
This Fee Schedule is issued in accordance with my rights as a private woman and Beneficial Owner, reserving all rights under UCC 1-308 and related authorities. Each violation listed constitutes an actionable breach for which damages are claimed. Continued failure of the Court, its officers, or associated agents to respond, acknowledge, or remediate these violations constitutes acquiescence and default and exposes the responsible parties to legal accountability.
Attached is the Fee Schedule / True Bill detailing each violation, legal authority, and corresponding penalty amount, totaling $2,699,010.00. This document is submitted to ensure that the Court records fully reflect all claims and to preserve all rights for subsequent enforcement or remedies.
Respectfully,
By: Naomi- Johnson, Sui Juris
Private Woman / Beneficial Owner
All Rights Reserved, UCC 1-308
Comments
Post a Comment