Naomi Johnson, Sui Juris Litigant
Glen Ridge Avenue
New Jersey
Email:
Phone:
Date:
To:
Glen Ridge Municipal Court
Judge Mark A. Clemente, Judge of Municipal Court
Elizabeth Brewster, Esq., Borough Prosecutor
Denise C. Iandolo, Municipal Court Administrator / Administrative Court Clerk/Violation
825 Bloomfield Avenue
Glen Ridge, NJ 07028
Re: NOTICE & DEMAND – Unlawful Administrative Warrant and Traffic Tickets
Dear Judge Clemente, Prosecutor Brewster, and Court Administrator Iandolo:
I am writing as a Sui Juris Litigant to formally demand that the unlawful administrative warrant in my name, along with the two traffic tickets issued on February 24, 2025, be immediately quashed, dismissed, and vacated without prejudice. Despite my submission of all supporting documents to the Court, the warrant remains active on the Glen Ridge Municipal Court website.
On February 24, 2025, I was stopped by Sgt. Anthony Mazza without legitimate grounds. Alleged infractions, including failure to stop at a stop sign and operating an unregistered vehicle, do not constitute legal grounds for the issuance of a warrant or seizure of property. A bench warrant was issued against me without notice, summons, or lawful communication, despite the traffic citation stating I was not required to appear.
The ongoing enforcement of this administrative warrant has caused me mental, emotional, and physical distress, restricting my freedom of movement and subjecting me to potential unlawful arrest. The use of race designations on the ticket and warrant also constitutes discriminatory profiling.
Demand:
1. Immediate quashing, dismissal, and vacation of the administrative warrant and two traffic tickets without prejudice.
2. Written confirmation that my rights under the New Jersey and U.S. Constitutions have been fully restored.
3. Immediate cessation of all administrative harassment or coercion related to this matter.
Failure to comply with this Notice and Demand will result in the filing of claims in Federal Court for ongoing violations of constitutional rights, equal protection, due process, and fiduciary duties by government officials.
Attached:
• Tort Claim
• OPRA Requests
• Copies of traffic tickets, warrant, and correspondence
• Evidence of disability
• Memorial of Judicial Duty and Constitutional Law Assertion
Respectfully submitted,
Naomi Johnson, Sui Juris Litigant
Glen Ridge Avenue
New Jersey 07042
Email:
Phone:
CC:
• Samantha J. Mendenhall, Presiding Judge of Municipal Courts
• Deidra Barlow, Assistant Director, Essex County Courthouse
Naomi Johnson, Sui Juris Litigant
Glen Ridge Avenue
New Jersey
Email:
Phone:
Date: September 5, 2025
To:
Glen Ridge Municipal Court
Judge Mark A. Clemente, Judge of Municipal Court
Elizabeth Brewster, Esq., Borough Prosecutor
Denise C. Iandolo, Municipal Court Administrator / Administrative Court Clerk/Violation
825 Bloomfield Avenue
Glen Ridge, NJ 07028
NOTICE & DEMAND
I have looked on the Municipal Court website and I notice that the Glen Ridge Administrative Court Clerk/Violation still has the unlawful active administrative warrant in my name and the two traffic tickets. I sent in all documents to dismiss the warrant and ticket. According to the law, when a prosecutor or court cannot meet the burden against a defendant, the case must be dismissed. (Maxim of Law: “The burden of proof lies upon him who affirms, not upon him who denies.”)
On February 24, 2025, government public servant Sgt. Anthony Mazza stopped me without any legitimate grounds, activating his emergency silent siren. An alleged failure to stop at a stop sign does not constitute probable cause or reasonable articulable suspicion. To lawfully demand my license, he would have needed to suspect me of a crime, which neither the Glen Ridge Police Department nor the Glen Ridge Municipal Court has proven. Failure to stop and operating an unregistered conveyance do not justify seizing or towing my car, nor do they authorize violations of my rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
Towing my car as a disabled woman, especially as a non-commercial private vehicle, is wholly unacceptable. I requested evidence from the court proving that I was operating a “motor vehicle” under Title 39, 48 C.F.R., and the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSR), whose definitions appear on every MVC registration form. I submitted evidence of the CFR and FMCSR definitions, which apply to Title 39 regarding what constitutes a motor vehicle, yet the court provided no evidence.
I also submitted a Show Cause document requesting jurisdictional evidence, which the court failed to provide. A court must have three types of jurisdiction to proceed: personal, subject matter, and territorial. The Glen Ridge Court established none. (*Maxim of Law: “Where jurisdiction is lacking, everything is lacking.” See also Ex parte McCardle, 74 U.S. 506 (1869).)
The traffic ticket explicitly stated that I was not required to appear in court. Despite this, a bench warrant for failure to appear was issued against me. I was later assigned a court date of April 8th. Prior to that date, I submitted multiple certified documents, including a Motion to Dismiss and a Show Cause, to the Prosecutor, Elizabeth Brewster, Esq., and the Administrative Court Clerk/Violation, Denise C. Iandolo. The court and Judge Mark A. Clemente failed to respond to any of my filings. Instead, I learned via email from a Glen Ridge Lieutenant that a warrant had been issued in my name. I never received any summons, notice, or lawful communication indicating that a warrant existed. This constitutes a clear violation of due process, as I was deprived of notice and the opportunity to defend myself in accordance with New Jersey law and the Constitution.
In New Jersey, individuals charged with certain traffic offenses may respond without appearing in court by submitting a plea by mail, as provided under Court Rule 7:12-3. State law further requires that the court notify a person when a bench warrant is issued for failure to appear. I submitted an Answer to the court by mail, as permitted under this Rule. Despite this, a bench warrant was nonetheless issued against me.
Following that, I submitted additional documents, including a Motion to Quash the unlawful warrant, a Notice to Vacate the two invalid traffic tickets, a Notice of Default, evidence of my disability, a receipt for reimbursement of the unlawful towing, and the court’s own statutory chart detailing when a police officer is authorized to tow a motor vehicle.
I also provided Glen Ridge’s official definitions of “motor vehicle,” “automobile,” and “conveyance” to demonstrate that my vehicle does not meet the criteria outlined on the court’s website. The Borough’s licensing requirements primarily apply to businesses subject to police oversight and other municipal ordinances—none of which apply to my situation.
At this time, I am being subjected to harassment and coerced into relinquishing my constitutional rights as one of the People and a private woman. The court continues to attempt to hold me accountable under commercial and administrative law, as well as agency procedures and statutes. By definition, no statute, regulation, or administrative practice can override the Constitution, and any law or action repugnant to the Constitution is void. (Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803).)
When I read the New Jersey Constitution and the United States Constitution, it is clear: the People govern the government, not the government govern the People. Article I, Paragraph 2 of the New Jersey Constitution states:
“All political power is inherent in the people. Government is instituted for the protection, security, and benefit of the people, and they have the right at all times to alter or reform it, whenever the public good may require it.”
Similarly, the United States Constitution recognizes the sovereignty of the People. The Preamble begins:
“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”
Further, the Constitution explicitly secures unalienable rights for the People:
• Fifth Amendment: No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.
• Fourteenth Amendment: No State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
These provisions reinforce that the People retain ultimate authority and that government officials—including Judge Mark A. Clemente, Prosecutor Elizabeth Brewster, Esq., and Clerk Denise C. Iandolo—take an oath to protect these rights. Any administrative action, such as an unlawful warrant or traffic citation against me, that violates these protections is unconstitutional and void. (Maxim of Law: “What is done contrary to the law is considered as not done at all.” – Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803).) (SCOTUS precedent: Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co., 458 U.S. 50 (1982).)
Keeping an administrative warrant on me is unconstitutional. I, as one of the People that the Constitution speaks of, am entitled to a judicial process, not an administrative process. The legislature has no authority to replace constitutionally commanded courts with legislative courts that enforce enactments of legislation. This violates the separation of powers. At this point, we both know the ticket and the administrative warrant are void.
After I demanded that the warrant and traffic tickets be dismissed, quashed, and vacated, you chose to ignore my demands as one of the People. I am not a part of the government’s business franchise. Government officials are agents and trustees of the public trust, obligated by oath to uphold the Constitution and protect the rights of the People.
In private trusts, maladministration by a trustee can result in severe penalties, including imprisonment. This is even more serious for public trusts, and the Constitution is the highest public trust established by the People. Government officials are trustees. When government officials violate the rights of one of the People, they commit a breach of trust and are liable for severe penalties. “No state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it.” (Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1 (1958).)
All government officials are trustees of those public trusts, bound by oath to protect, preserve, and defend the rights secured therein. I, as one of the People, am a beneficiary of this public trust. I am entitled to a judicial forum.
When a government official violates the rights of one of the People, such acts constitute a breach of trust and a violation of their fiduciary duties as trustee of the public trust. Such a breach incurs personal liability and exposes the wrongdoer to serious penalties under the supreme law of the land. (Maxim of Law: “The violation of a sacred trust shall not go unpunished.”)
I ask you, as a government agent and public servant, by what delegated authority you, as Administrative Court Clerk/Violation Denise C. Iandolo, exercise power over me, one of the People and a private woman? Show me where in the New Jersey Constitution it says that all political power is inherent in the government, rather than in the People.
Administrative action is unlawful where it contravenes constitutional rights, exceeds statutory jurisdiction, or is contrary to statutory rights. See 5 U.S.C. § 706(2). The rights of the People, such as mine, have traditionally been heard in common law courts. (Northern Pipeline v. Marathon, 458 U.S. 50 (1982).)
According to the Constitution, no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. Since February 24, 2025, with the unlawful ticket and warrant, I have suffered deprivation. I cannot move around freely knowing there is an unlawful warrant in my name. A police officer may arrest me because of the false claim that I failed to comply with a summons. I have been afraid to leave my house, and when I do go out with my neighbor or take a walk, I am constantly looking over my shoulder, knowing this warrant instructs police to arrest me.
Not only does the warrant instruct police to pick me up as if I were a felon, it also lists my race as “Black” on the traffic ticket and “Black/African American” on the warrant. This constitutes discriminatory profiling in violation of the Equal Protection Clause (U.S. Const. Amend. XIV). (Acts 10:34 – “God is no respecter of persons.”)
The administrative tribunal was created by the legislature, and it is exercising administrative power, not judicial power. The very creation of statutory courts in place of constitutionally mandated courts is a violation. Such tribunals are void. (Maxim of Law: “What is done contrary to the law is considered as not done at all.”)
The Glen Ridge Court and Police Department have infringed upon my constitutional rights. Article III of the U.S. Constitution establishes an independent judiciary to protect the People from the loss of life, liberty, and property without due process of law. Legislative tribunals such as Glen Ridge Municipal Court do not have jurisdiction to adjudicate People’s rights.
The Glen Ridge Court’s apparent focus has been on obtaining Federal Reserve fiat payment from me to satisfy an unlawful ticket, rather than upholding the Supreme Law of the land or providing the evidence I requested to defend myself properly. I have been subjected to coercion, force, and unlawful demands by the Glen Ridge Court and Sgt. Anthony Mazza. He showed no respect for me as a disabled woman and as a minister. My minister parking decal was clearly visible on my dashboard when he towed my conveyance. He demanded my license, which constitutes a constitutional violation, as he lacked probable cause to suspect me of any crime.
The Municipal Court is a quasi-criminal, quasi-judicial tribunal without full judicial power. It possesses neither delegated authority nor express consent to act upon me as one of the People, a private woman. Since the Glen Ridge Court is acting in a quasi-criminal manner, I retain the right under the Sixth Amendment to face my accuser. My accuser must be a living, breathing man or woman—not a corporation such as the State of New Jersey. According to Dun & Bradstreet, the traffic court is listed as a business under the State of New Jersey umbrella. There is nothing judicial about a court operating as a business masquerading as a court while violating the constitutional rights of the People.
I received a court date of August 5th, 2025, and I uploaded my Answer, Demurrer, and Affirmative Defense to the Municipal Court website under my account, which indicated that documents should be uploaded prior to the August 5th court date. After uploading my documents on the Municipal Court website, I sent an email to the Administrative Court Clerk, cc’ing the Prosecutor, Denise C. Iandolo, and Judge Mark A. Clemente. Following the email, I mailed the documents as well. I also sent a Private Judicial Notice directly to Judge Mark A. Clemente. In these filings, I again demanded that the unlawful warrant be removed and the traffic tickets vacated without prejudice. As of today, September 5, 2025, the unlawful warrant remains active. This has persisted far too long, and my rights have been violated since February 24, 2025. The ongoing situation has caused me mental, emotional, and physical suffering.
The Glen Ridge Court and Police Department are acting as if they are above the law. Let it be clear: no one is above the law. The law is not meant to be broken; it is meant to be followed. No federal statutes, rules, regulations, codes, ordinances, or procedures override the United States Constitution. Similarly, no New Jersey state statutes, rules, regulations, codes, ordinances, or procedures override the New Jersey Constitution. No state statute, regulation, or ordinance can override the Federal Constitution.
Every judge, police officer, prosecutor, court clerk, and Administrative Court Clerk/Violation has taken a sworn oath to uphold the Constitution, which is the binding contract between the government as trustee and the People as sovereign. I, as one of the People, remain entitled to the full protections of both the Federal and New Jersey Constitutions. (Romans 13:1 – “Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.”)
The court has deliberately refused to provide me with the evidence necessary to challenge this unlawful case, denying me the fundamental right to a fair hearing. As a disabled woman, I requested a reasonable accommodation in the form of a remote hearing; the judge instead suggested that I appear at a library, a proposal that fails to meet the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and effectively denies access to justice.
Furthermore, the Glen Ridge Municipal Court has refused to vacate the administrative warrant issued against me and has failed to withdraw the unlawful traffic ticket. These refusals constitute ongoing violations of my constitutional rights, including my rights to due process and equal protection under both the New Jersey Constitution and the United States Constitution. By persisting in these actions, the court is acting beyond its lawful authority and is coercing me to forfeit my rights as a private citizen.
You are hereby placed on notice, and I am moving my case to Federal Court: any act that contravenes constitutionally secured rights is an act beyond lawful authority, without immunity, and subject to prosecution and civil liability in both public and private capacities.
(Proverbs 17:15 – “He that justifieth the wicked, and he that condemneth the just, even they both are abomination to the Lord.”)
Respectfully submitted,
Naomi Johnson, Sui Juris Litigant
Glen Ridge Avenue
New Jersey 07042
Email:
Phone:
CC Samatha J. Mendenahall, P.J.M.C.
Deidra Barlow, Asst. Director
Essex County Courthouse
50 West Market Street-Floor 7
Newark, NJ 07102
Glen Ridge Court
Mark A. Clemente, J.M.C.
Denise Iandolo, C.M.C.A.
Prosecutor, Elizabeth Brewster, Esq.,
Glen Ridge Municipal Court
• Attached is my Tort Claim
• Notice for Liability to ...
Denise Iandolo, C.M.C.A.
Prosecutor, Elizabeth Brewster, Esq.,
Mark A. Clemente, J.M.C.
OPRA Request...
• For Oath of Office
• Mark A. Clemente, J.M.C.
• Denise Iandolo, C.M.C.A.
• Prosecutor, Elizabeth Brewster, Esq.,
• Surety Insurance Bond
• Delegation of authority and more documents.
• Mark A. Clemente, J.M.C. letter to me
Sent to New Jersey Courts-Administrative Office of the Courts
• The print out off of the Municipal Court showing that the warrant is still active.
• Essex County Recovery Bureau Inc. ECRB towing
• Glen Ridge Police Internal Affair Report
• My Disability Certificate from my doctor with the prescription
• A public record link with all the documents I have wrote to the Glen Ridge Municipal Court and Police department parties involved.
• The traffic ticket with B for black as my race.
• Memorial of Judicial Duty and Constitutional Law Assertion of the Supreme Law for We the People.
• Copy of the Tort Claim
Naomi Johnson, Sui Juris Litigant
Glen Ridge Avenue
New Jersey
Email:
Phone:
Date: September 5, 2025
To:
Administrative Office of the Courts – Essex County
Attention:
Samantha J. Mendenhall, Presiding Judge of Municipal Courts
Anu Abraham, Municipal Division Manager
Essex County Courthouse
50 West Market Street, Floor 7
Newark, NJ 07102
Re: NOTICE & DEMAND – Unlawful Administrative Warrant and Traffic Tickets – Glen Ridge Municipal Court
Dear Presiding Judge Mendenhall and Ms. Abraham:
I am writing as a Sui Juris Litigant to formally notify your office of ongoing violations of my constitutional and statutory rights by the Glen Ridge Municipal Court, including the continued posting of an active administrative warrant in my name and two traffic tickets issued on February 24, 2025. Despite submitting multiple filings to the Court—including Motions to Dismiss, Motions to Quash, Show Cause requests, and ADA accommodation requests—these matters remain unresolved.
Background:
• On February 24, 2025, Sgt. Anthony Mazza stopped me without probable cause or reasonable suspicion and demanded my license. Alleged infractions, including failure to stop at a stop sign and operating an unregistered non-commercial private vehicle, do not constitute criminal activity sufficient to justify such action.
• My vehicle was unlawfully towed despite my visible minister parking decal and evidence of disability.
• I requested proof that my vehicle qualifies as a “motor vehicle” under Title 39, 48 C.F.R., and the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations, yet no evidence was provided.
• I challenged the Court’s jurisdiction through Show Cause documents and other filings, yet the Court has provided no evidence establishing personal, subject matter, or territorial jurisdiction. (Maxim of Law: “Where jurisdiction is lacking, everything is lacking.” Ex parte McCardle, 74 U.S. 506 (1869).)
• A bench warrant was issued against me despite the ticket explicitly stating I was not required to appear in Court, in violation of due process under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments and New Jersey law (Court Rule 7:12-3).
• My filings, including an Answer, Demurrer, Affirmative Defense, and motions, have been ignored.
Constitutional Violations:
• My rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments and the New Jersey Constitution (Article I, Paragraph 2) have been violated.
• Racial designations on the traffic ticket and warrant (“Black” / “Black/African American”) indicate discriminatory profiling in violation of the Equal Protection Clause.
• My requests for ADA accommodations have been ignored, denying access to judicial remedies as a disabled individual.
• The Court’s administrative actions contravene constitutional authority, exceed statutory jurisdiction, and are void under Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803) and Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co., 458 U.S. 50 (1982).
Demand:
1. Immediate quashing, dismissal, and vacation of the administrative warrant and two traffic tickets without prejudice.
2. Written confirmation that my constitutional and statutory rights have been restored.
3. Immediate compliance with ADA requirements for access to judicial remedies.
4. Assurance that no further administrative or coercive actions will be taken against me.
Attached are supporting documents, including:
• Tort Claim
• OPRA Requests (Oaths of Office, Surety Bonds, Delegation of Authority)
• Copies of traffic tickets, warrant, and correspondence
• Evidence of disability
• Memorial of Judicial Duty and Constitutional Law Assertion
This letter serves as formal notice that the Glen Ridge Municipal Court’s ongoing refusal to address these matters constitutes a violation of the supreme law of the land and exposes the responsible parties to potential civil liability and enforcement action.
Respectfully submitted,
Naomi Johnson, Sui Juris Litigant
Glen Ridge Avenue
New Jersey
Email:
Phone:
CC:
• Glen Ridge Municipal Court: Judge Mark A. Clemente, Prosecutor Elizabeth Brewster, Esq., Clerk Denise C. Iandolo
• Essex County Municipal Court Administration
NOTICE & DEMAND – Unlawful Administrative Warrant and Traffic Tickets – Glen Ridge Municipal Court Outline
I. Introduction
1. I am writing as a Sui Juris Litigant to formally notify your office of ongoing violations of my constitutional and statutory rights by the Glen Ridge Municipal Court, including the continued posting of an active administrative warrant in my name and two traffic tickets issued on February 24, 2025.
2. Despite submitting multiple filings to the Court—including Motions to Dismiss, Motions to Quash, Show Cause requests, and ADA accommodation requests—these matters remain unresolved, creating ongoing deprivation of my liberty and property rights.
II. Background Facts
3. On February 24, 2025, Sgt. Anthony Mazza stopped me without probable cause or reasonable suspicion, activating an emergency silent siren. Alleged infractions, including failure to stop at a stop sign and operating an unregistered non-commercial private vehicle, do not constitute criminal activity sufficient to justify seizure or demand for my license.
4. My vehicle was unlawfully towed despite a visible minister parking decal and evidence of disability, in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
5. I requested evidence from the Court demonstrating that my vehicle qualifies as a “motor vehicle” under Title 39, 48 C.F.R., and FMCSR, yet no evidence was provided.
6. I challenged the Court’s jurisdiction via Show Cause documents and other filings. The Court has failed to establish personal, subject matter, or territorial jurisdiction. (Maxim of Law: “Where jurisdiction is lacking, everything is lacking.” Ex parte McCardle, 74 U.S. 506 (1869).)
7. A bench warrant was issued against me despite the ticket explicitly stating I was not required to appear in Court, violating due process under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments and Court Rule 7:12-3.
8. My filings, including an Answer, Demurrer, Affirmative Defense, and motions, have been ignored, causing ongoing mental, emotional, and physical distress.
III. Constitutional and Legal Violations
9. My rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution and Article I, Paragraph 2 of the New Jersey Constitution have been violated.
10. The racial designation on the traffic ticket and warrant (“Black” / “Black/African American”) constitutes discriminatory profiling, violating the Equal Protection Clause.
11. The Court’s failure to provide ADA accommodations denies me access to judicial remedies as a disabled individual, violating federal and state law.
12. Administrative action taken by the Glen Ridge Municipal Court exceeds statutory authority, contravenes constitutional law, and is void under:
• Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)
• Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co., 458 U.S. 50 (1982)
13. All government officials, including judges, prosecutors, and court clerks, act as trustees of the public trust and are personally liable for breaches of duty (Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1 (1958)).
IV. Procedural History
14. Since February 24, 2025, I have submitted the following to Glen Ridge Municipal Court:
• Motion to Dismiss and Show Cause
• Motion to Quash Unlawful Warrant
• Notice to Vacate Two Invalid Traffic Tickets
• Notice of Default
• Evidence of Disability
• Receipt for Reimbursement of Unlawful Towing
• Glen Ridge Court Statutory Chart on Police Authority to Tow
• Official Definitions of Motor Vehicle, Automobile, and Conveyance
15. I also submitted Private Judicial Notice to Judge Mark A. Clemente and uploaded documents through the Court’s portal. Despite these efforts, the warrant remains active, constituting ongoing violation of my constitutional and statutory rights.
V. Harassment and Coercion
16. The Glen Ridge Municipal Court has:
• Acted administratively rather than judicially
• Attempted to coerce Federal Reserve fiat payment instead of upholding constitutional protections
• Ignored repeated requests for ADA accommodations
• Refused to provide jurisdictional evidence or respond to filings
17. I have been unable to move freely due to the threat of unlawful arrest. My vehicle and person have been unlawfully targeted, and I have suffered fear, anxiety, and restriction of my personal liberty.
VI. Demands
Therefore, I hereby demand:
1. Immediate quashing, dismissal, and vacation of the administrative warrant and two traffic tickets without prejudice.
2. Written confirmation that my constitutional and statutory rights have been fully restored.
3. Immediate compliance with ADA requirements to ensure access to judicial remedies.
4. Cessation of all administrative coercion or harassment related to this matter.
VII. Supporting Documents
Attached are supporting materials:
• Tort Claim
• My request asking Glen Ridge Court: OPRA Requests (Oaths of Office, Surety Bonds, Delegation of Authority)
• Copies of traffic tickets, warrant, and correspondence
• Evidence of disability
• Memorial of Judicial Duty and Constitutional Law Assertion
• My public record website link correspond to Glen Ridge court and Glen Ridge Police
VIII. Conclusion
18. This letter serves as formal notice that Glen Ridge Municipal Court’s ongoing refusal to address these matters constitutes violation of supreme law and exposes the responsible parties to civil liability and enforcement action.
19. I reserve all rights to pursue federal judicial remedies and hold responsible parties personally liable for breaches of trust and constitutional violations.
Respectfully submitted,
Naomi Johnson, Sui Juris Litigant
Glen Ridge Avenue
New Jersey
Email:
Phone:
CC:
• Glen Ridge Municipal Court: Judge Mark A. Clemente, Prosecutor Elizabeth Brewster, Esq., Clerk Denise C. Iandolo
• Essex County Municipal Court Administration
Comments
Post a Comment