Glen Ridge Municipal Court Judge Mark Clemente Letter To Naomi and Response to July 25, 2025 Judicial Letter / Demand to Appear
PUBLIC RECORD NOTICE
The documents contained on this page, including but not limited to affidavits, rebuttals, tort claim notices, and related submissions concerning the Glen Ridge Court and public servants, are intended to serve as a public record.
These documents have been made publicly accessible in accordance with principles of:
Transparency and accountability in government operations;
Public Rights Doctrine and Popular Sovereignty, recognizing the people as the ultimate authority;
New Jersey Open Public Records Act (OPRA), N.J.S.A. 47:1A-1 et seq., supporting access to governmental records;
U.S. Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. §552, supporting public disclosure of information concerning government conduct;
Purpose:
To preserve a legal and historical record of official actions, including investigations, internal affairs reports, and civil rights concerns;
To provide public access for review, transparency, and accountability;
To document the timeline and content of government actions for potential legal reference.
Usage:
The contents may be freely accessed, downloaded, and referenced for educational, journalistic, civic, or legal purposes.
Users must not modify the original documents.
Disclaimer:
Personal information unrelated to public officers or government action has been redacted where necessary to protect privacy.
This notice is not intended to replace any legal filings or proceedings; it supplements legal documentation by providing public access.
Date of Record Creation: August 28, 2025
Author / Beneficial Owner: Naomi Johnson, We The People / Private Woman
.png)
My correspondence serves as a formal Notice of Continued Due Process Violation and Judicial Misconduct To Judge Clemente.pdf
Naomi Johnson
Private Woman / Beneficial Owner
Address:
Town, State and Zip Code
Email:
Phone:
Date: August 26, 2025
To:
Judge Mark Clemente
Glen Ridge Municipal Court
825 Bloomfield Avenue
Glen Ridge, New Jersey 07044
Re: Response to July 25, 2025 Judicial Letter / Demand to Appear
Dear Judge Clemente,
I, Naomi Johnson, a private citizen woman and beneficial owner, am in receipt of your email dated July 25, 2025, in response to my certified filings titled Motion to Quash/ Notice to Vacate Warrant, Traffic Tickets and assorted items with regards to the above charges that are presently pending in Glen Ridge Municipal Court. In that message, you state, “As I understand it, your failure to appear has resulted in a bench warrant issued by my court. If that is your intention, i.e., to pay them online, we can recall the warrant and you will not need to appear.” This language demonstrates an attempt to compel payment of an unlawful traffic citation under threat of a bench warrant, which constitutes coercion and operates outside lawful judicial procedure. I therefore respond under protest, without waiver of rights, to preserve my liberty, due process protections, and to prevent further injury.
Judge Mark Clemente, in another section of your letter, you also stated, “I will be hearing the motions and other applications you may wish to make at that time.” I understand this statement to reflect a willful refusal to address motions properly filed and served in advance of any hearing. A judge is obligated to rule on motions that raise jurisdictional, procedural, or constitutional objections before compelling an appearance. Conditioning the adjudication of these motions upon my physical presence, especially under threat of a bench warrant, operates outside the boundaries of due process and suggests coercion rather than lawful judicial conduct. This conduct is in violation of Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976); Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 (1970); Fuentes v. Shevin, 407 U.S. 67 (1972); American Jurisprudence 2d, Constitutional Law § 832; Corpus Juris Secundum, Constitutional Law § 1388; and American Jurisprudence 2d, Judges § 94.
I have not consented to any lawful contract with the State or Glen Ridge Municipal Court. There is no injured party, no verified claim under penalty of perjury, and no cause of action grounded in due process or fact. Coercing performance, such as payment of a traffic ticket under threat of a bench warrant, without a lawful contract or judicial determination, constitutes a violation of Article I, Section 10, Clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution. Furthermore, under Public Law 73-10 / House Joint Resolution 192, I am not obligated to perform or tender payment where no lawful consideration or agreement exists.
All of the People have the right to recognition before the law and equal protection under the law.
Demand for Evidence of Lawful Jurisdiction
As of today, your court has failed to respond to:
• my Affidavit of Facts and Truth,
• my Motion to Dismiss,
• my Notice to Show Cause,
• and my Notice of Default and Opportunity to Cure.
This constitutes dishonor, default, and tacit admission that the court lacks lawful jurisdiction over my private person. I have demanded, and continue to demand:
Proof of claim that Glen Ridge Municipal Court has lawful judicial jurisdiction over a private woman, not engaged in commercial activity, not acting under the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Act, Title 39, nor 47 CFR per MVC Motor Vehicle Commission vehicle registration form in New Jersey. Silence is acquiescence.
2. Presumption of Law vs. Facts in Evidence (Rule 301)
Federal Rule of Evidence 301 affirms that:
"A presumption imposes on the party against whom it is directed the burden of producing evidence to rebut the presumption."
Your court has presumed that I am:
• a legal person (corporate fiction),
• engaged in regulated commercial activity,
• subject to administrative traffic codes and licensing requirements,
• and voluntarily consenting to the court’s jurisdiction.
None of these presumptions have been lawfully proven, nor have I ever knowingly waived any rights.
3. Notice of Constitutional and Civil Rights Violations
You, the Clerk, and the Prosecutor, as public servants and officers of the court, have a constitutional oath of office to uphold the United States and New Jersey Constitutions. Your conduct to date reflects:
• Violation of my right to due process (5th & 14th Amendments),
• Denial of equal protection under the law (14th Amendment),
• Violation of my New Jersey Constitution unalienable right to liberty and property without due process,
• ADA violations, as I am disabled and was unlawfully forced to walk after my vehicle was towed,
• Cruel and unusual punishment and intimidation through coercive threats of arrest without lawful warrant (8th Amendment).
4. Supporting Authorities in Law
Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803) – “All laws repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.”
Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham, 394 U.S. 147 (1969) – You cannot punish people for exercising a constitutionally protected right.
Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616 (1886) – "Illegitimate and unconstitutional practices get their first footing in that way..."
Title 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 & 1985 – Civil liability attaches when public officials conspire to violate constitutional rights.
6. Remedy Demanded
I hereby demand the following:
1. Immediate withdrawal of all unlawful presumptions and the improperly issued bench warrant;
2. Certified documentation proving judicial jurisdiction and lawful authority over my private person;
3. A full record of the commercial account or bond created in my name without my knowledge or consent;
4. Dismissal of all charges due to lack of jurisdiction and constitutional violations;
5. A written apology and public correction from your office acknowledging the due process errors and unlawful acts.
Respectfully Reserved
I reserve all rights, waiving none, without prejudice per UCC 1-308, and I stand as a private woman under natural law, common law, and the Constitution, not subject to involuntary commercial contracts nor foreign administrative tribunals or any other acts that is associated with the FARA Foreign Agents Registration Act.
Sincerely,
Naomi Johnson
Private Citizen Woman / Beneficial Owner
All Rights Reserved – UCC 1-308, Without Prejudice
C.C
Chief Justice Stuart Rabner-NJ
Supreme Court-Hon. Glenn A. Grant, AOC
U.S. DOJ – Civil Rights Division
NJ Division on Civil Rights
State ADA Coordinator
NJ Attorney General, Matthew J. Platkin
U.S. Attorney General, Merrick Garland
Administrative Office of the Courts – NJ
U.S. Department of the Treasury
U.S. Secret Service
Office of Special Counsel, U.S. DOJ
Naomi Johnson
Glen Ridge, New Jersey 07028
Address:
Town, State and Zip Code
Email:
Phone:
August 1, 2025
Denise C. Iandolo
Municipal Court Administrator
Glen Ridge Municipal Court
825 Bloomfield Avenue
Glen Ridge, NJ 07028
Subject: Notice of Due Process Violation and Judicial Misconduct: State of NJ v. Johnson
Dear Judge Clemente,
This correspondence serves as a Formal Notice of Continued Due Process Violation and Judicial Misconduct in the above-referenced matter.
Your email dated July 28, 2025, confirms receipt of my certified filings, including my Motion to Quash Warrant, Motion to Dismiss, Affidavit of Truth, and other documents, which were delivered to the court on July 19, 2025.
It is now a matter of record that Glen Ridge Municipal Court issued a bench warrant after receiving my motions—without rebuttal, hearing, or lawful adjudication—constituting a direct violation of the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause.
To date, you have failed to:
• Provide proof of subject matter, personal, and territorial jurisdiction;
• Produce a verified complaint, sworn under penalty of perjury by a competent and injured party;
• Submit admissible evidence to support any claim against me. The burden of proof lies with the State to establish wrongdoing;
• Afford me the opportunity to cross-examine any witness or review supporting documentation in order to effectively defend myself;
• Establish that I am a commercial operator subject to Title 39 of New Jersey Statutes or 49 CFR commercial transportation regulations;
• Provide any evidence of a lawful contract binding me to administrative traffic codes or obligations.
In addition, your failure to provide reasonable accommodations under the ADA, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 12132, constitutes a separate civil rights violation. Directing me to use a library entrance does not address my documented medical disability, nor does it fulfill my request for remote appearance or medical exemption from in-person proceedings.
Your offer to “resolve” this matter by me paying online, while ignoring the substantive legal objections and affidavits already on record, demonstrates an abuse of discretion and a breach of fiduciary duty under Canon 1 and Canon 2 of the New Jersey Code of Judicial Conduct. You are constitutionally barred from demanding or coercing payment without first proving jurisdiction and providing an opportunity for meaningful hearing on the record.
I do not consent to a presumption of jurisdiction. My affidavit remains unrebutted in law, and stands as truth until lawfully challenged. If this matter proceeds without establishing lawful jurisdiction, it shall constitute fraud upon the court and a violation of your oath of office, as required under Article VI, Clause 3 of the U.S. Constitution.
Demand for Action
I hereby demand:
1. A written ruling on all motions and affidavits previously submitted;
2. A certified statement of jurisdictional facts entered on the record.
Failure to respond in good faith may result in further legal action, including federal notice of claim, judicial complaint filings, and referral to oversight bodies for misconduct.
Respectfully,
Naomi Johnson
Private Woman / Beneficial Owner
cc:
Chief Justice Stuart Rabner
Hon. Glenn A. Grant, AOC
Office of Attorney Ethics
U.S. DOJ – Civil Rights Division
NJ Division on Civil Rights
State ADA Coordinator
Court Administrator Denise C. Iandolo,
Prosecutor Elizabeth Brewster,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Naomi Johnson, a living woman and Beneficial Owner, hereby certify that on this ___ day of ____________, 2025, I served a true and correct copy of the attached:
Comments
Post a Comment